2025_08_19 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID:9ADB105A-9CF3-46D3-BFE6-DD24AB853FF3 Current Assessed Value $287,000 County Opinion $287,000 Time of Hearin 2:29PM Appellant Opinion $270,000 County Representative C le Anderson Board Decision $287,000 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • The appellant provided a Zillow estimate and the value of a nearby unit,unit A-52,to support their opinion of value. Evidence submitted by the county representative: • The subject property is located at 105 Fidelity Street,Unit 12, Carrboro,in the White Oak Condominium project, in Carrboro. The County visited the property for photos and for physical verification. The County also performed a sales analysis of all the comparable sales in this condominium project from 2023 and 2024. • The appellant's price per square foot is less than the comparable sales because these units were recently updated. Therefore,the lack of updates to the subject property is taken into account as its assessment is lower than that of the updated units. The County recommends no change in value as the appellant did not submit any photos or cost to cure estimates to support their claim. • Photos of Subject Property • GIS Map • Sales Analysis • Current Property Record Card of Subject Motion of the Board Accept the Coun 's recommendation of no change in value Made the motion Barbara Levine Seconded the motion Richal Vanhook Voted For Leon Meyers Voted Against Property Identification: Property Owner John Martelli Appellant if different Property Address 1623 Ainsworth Parcel ID or Abstract 9875801992� Boulevard Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on drainage and erosion issues that exist on 25- 30%of the subject property. Current Assessed Value $632,900 County Opinion $613,400 Time of Hearin 2:31PM Appellant Opinion $599,000 County Representative C le Anderson Board Decision $613,400 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • The appellant states that 25%to 30%of the subject's land has drainage ditches,erosion and low land,which makes this lot costly to maintain. The appellant provided a plat map with these areas highlighted.