Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 9.3.25 <br /> 1865 <br /> 1866 Chris Johnston: No, I'm doing consistent. <br /> 1867 <br /> 1868 Lamar Proctor: I will say on Page 130, there is one typo on Number 3. It says the minimum lot size M-E to 20, <br /> 1869 000 square feet. That should be B. I don't know if we need to make that amendment, or if that's <br /> 1870 just typographical. <br /> 1871 <br /> 1872 Cy Stober: Please make the amendment. <br /> 1873 <br /> 1874 Lamar Proctor: Motion to adopt the Statement of Consistency in Attachment 6 with the amendment that Number <br /> 1875 3,the word "me"will be changed to"be". <br /> 1876 <br /> 1877 Chris Johnston: Yes. So motioned. <br /> 1878 <br /> 1879 Lamar Proctor: Is there a second? <br /> 1880 <br /> 1881 Statler Gilfillen: I'll second that one. <br /> 1882 <br /> 1883 Lamar Proctor: All right. All in favor of adopting the Statement of Consistency in Attachment 6 to find that the <br /> 1884 proposed Zoning Atlas Map Amendment is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and <br /> 1885 make that recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. Raise your hand and say Aye <br /> 1886 with that amendment to Number 3. <br /> 1887 <br /> 1888 MOTION BY Chris Johnston to approve the Statement of Consistency. Seconded by Statler Gilfillen. <br /> 1889 <br /> 1890 MOTION PASSED 6-3: Delores Bailey, Beth Bronson, and Meg Millard opposed. <br /> 1891 <br /> 1892 Lamar Proctor: And then I believe that for record purposes we want the opposed to state their reasons for the <br /> 1893 opposition. <br /> 1894 <br /> 1895 Meg Millard: I don't think it's consistent with the rural character. <br /> 1896 <br /> 1897 Lamar Proctor: Okay. Beth? <br /> 1898 <br /> 1899 Beth Bronson: I agree that I did not find a lot density of 20,000 square foot lots to be consistent with the area, as <br /> 1900 well as the preservation of community character. Land goal Number 3, is it? Planning principle <br /> 1901 Number 3, or Land Use Goal Number 3, and Planning Principle Number 8. From the <br /> 1902 comprehensive 2030 plan. <br /> 1903 <br /> 1904 Lamar Proctor: All right. <br /> 1905 <br /> 1906 Delores Bailey: I agree that I do not find it consistent with the conservation plan. <br /> 1907 <br /> 1908 Lamar Proctor: All right. Is that sufficient, Cy? <br /> 1909 <br /> 1910 Cy Stober: Thank you Mr. Chair. <br /> 1911 <br /> 1912 AGENDA ITEM 8: ADJOURNMENT <br /> 1913 <br /> 1914 Lamar Proctor: All right. Do I have a motion for adjournment? Is there anything else before we adjourn? <br /> 1915 <br /> 1916 Cy Stober: Just a note that this is at present scheduled for public hearing at the October 7th Board of <br /> 1917 Commissioners Meeting. <br /> 1918 <br />