Orange County NC Website
Approved 9.3.25 <br /> 769 the lots we picked were the weird, funky-shaped lots where you would have the most difficult <br /> 770 trouble in some of them. And the few spots that there wasn't suitable soil, you'll see one where it <br /> 771 was going through, so we chose those lots. I don't have the square footage on the top of my <br /> 772 head. <br /> 773 <br /> 774 Donna Crowder: But those are just examples anyway, right? <br /> 775 <br /> 776 David Barcal: Yeah. <br /> 777 <br /> 778 Charity Kirk: And so,with the conservation subdivision,why did you choose to do half-acre lots rather than, 1 <br /> 779 mean, it makes more financial sense, but is there any other rationality to do smaller lots when it's <br /> 780 becoming a sort of a question for the community of not matching the existing area. <br /> 781 <br /> 782 Beth Trahos: As a land planner, my understanding of the goal of the conservation was to have the smaller lots, <br /> 783 and the smaller the better, so that more area could be preserved in that open space. And so, 1 <br /> 784 think the balance was,what is a reasonable lot that can accommodate the individual septic but still <br /> 785 allow for the broader area to be preserved. So, this was where we came down. <br /> 786 <br /> 787 Charity Kirk: And have you considered offering any of these units or having any of these units be low-income <br /> 788 housing? Or like having a percentage be allotted to low-income housing? <br /> 789 <br /> 790 Beth Trahos: Our expectation is that this will be a market rate project and given the development costs in the <br /> 791 area,that's our expectation moving forward, so, no. <br /> 792 <br /> 793 Charity Kirk: Okay. I think I'm done for now. <br /> 794 <br /> 795 Chris Johnston: Okay. I have no questions. Thank you. <br /> 796 <br /> 797 Lamar Proctor: So, good evening. So, on Page 121, under general under No. 3. It says R-CD,which is a <br /> 798 residential conditional district. It includes a note for lots outside of a watershed protection overlay <br /> 799 district. The minimum usable lot are for lots that utilize ground absorption wastewater systems. <br /> 800 So that's septic, right? <br /> 801 <br /> 802 Donna Crowder: I'm sorry. I'm not caught up with you. 121. <br /> 803 <br /> 804 Lamar Proctor: Page 121. Planning section under the bottom. <br /> 805 <br /> 806 Donna Crowder: Okay, yes. <br /> 807 <br /> 808 Lamar Proctor: So, it's the minimum usable lot area for lots that utilize ground absorption wastewater system shall <br /> 809 be 30,000 square feet for parcels between 40,000 square feet and 1.99 acres in size. And then it <br /> 810 says consider the inclusion of the condition addressing that the proposed lot size is deviating from <br /> 811 the minimum and that the parcels will include suitable septic. I'm reading that right? That there's <br /> 812 a concern. And I appreciate the smaller lot sizes. I think that's the right direction. To concentrate <br /> 813 human housing and give more room to the environment. But how is septic going to work?Am 1 <br /> 814 reading that right? That there's a concern that the lot size is for septic get problematic. <br /> 815 <br /> 816 Beth Trahos: And so,there again,we also conducted the experts, and David Barcal is our septic expert, and he <br /> 817 can talk to you about how that would work. <br /> 818 <br /> 819 David Barcal: Yeah, we've done a preliminary soils analysis on the site that I talked about by a licensed soil <br /> 820 scientist as is mentioned earlier. Pretty much the whole development site was rated for <br /> 821 conventional use which is the highest quality soil you're going to find in this area. And we did <br /> 822 provide a couple of those. We did select those four lots that were going to be more problematic or <br /> 823 the tougher ones to simulate what we could fit in there and what would work as far as a four- <br />