Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-23-2004-10a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 06-23-2004
>
Agenda - 06-23-2004-10a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:16:11 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:43:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/23/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040623
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft April 16, 2004 <br />Concepls. The following concepts should be defined: <br />• Possible receiving zone(s), Affordable housing, <br />• Density, Down zoning, <br />• Bonus incentives Conservation easement, <br />• Development rights, and Sending zone, <br />Discussion. Issues that should be talked through might include the following: <br />• Multi jurisdictional program possibly involving Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and/or <br />Hillsborough. <br />• Is the public purchase of a conservation easement equivalent to the public purchase of a <br />property's development rights? <br />• Multiple owners in a single sending zone? <br />Other Issues. Other issues for discussion could include: <br />• Density means the number of development rights originating from an individual parcel.. <br />• When a development right is used, how shall it be extinguished? <br />• Development rights certificates cannot be transferred into another area defined as a <br />sending zone,. <br />• The nature of the easement placed on the sending zone parcel after transfer should allow <br />staff to resolve any zoning ordinance violation (i.e., derelict structures,,junk and debris, <br />multiple residential structures, and the like) before recording the easement. <br />• Equity of price of densities purchased weighted against the value of the densities <br />transferred. <br />Administrative Process <br />Proposed Policy. The Orange Corarty TDR program shall be made as simple as practical, for the <br />general public, elected and appointed officials, and property owners to understand, access, <br />monitor, and eval:rate,for the benefit of the public health, safety, and welfare. <br />Possible Sending Zone Characteristics. To be eligible as a sending zone, a parcel of land shall <br />have a threshold of characteristics, which may include the following: <br />Mature forestland, Working farmland, Steep forested slopes, More than ten acres in size, <br />Adjoining public parkland or another conservation easement, Significant geologic, <br />archaeological resource, or designated wild life corridor, Historic or Architectural resource, <br />Critical watershed for a drinking water source, or Protected watershed for a drinking water <br />source. <br />Use of Sending Zoue lnrrd after transfer of developarerrt rights. Any change or use or activities <br />in a sending zone after hansfer shall require the Orange County Planning Director to determine if <br />the proposed change of'use or activity is compliant with the conservation easement, <br />Conversion ofDevelopnrent Rights, When evaluating a tract of land as a potential sending zone, <br />the development rights may be converted into a transfer certificate at the given rate. <br />Bonus Incentives. Addition bonus incentives may be given if the resulting development provides <br />the following: affordable housing, Leadership in Environmental Design (LEED) compliance, <br />redevelopment of a brownfield or other priority site, and possibly other bonus incentives? <br />Rece>iving7.orre. General design guidelines for the receiving zone should be established <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.