AHAB Meeting Minutes March 2024 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

iii. Sarah: what are the blank columns? I sent all my scores to Thomas. I will resubmit them. iv. Blake: In column H,there's a 8 which I don't understand why it is partially scored. We should remove the 8 so the rest of the scores are not skewed. v. Andrew: should we honor the score instead of removing it? If they purposely put a score for line 27 it should reflect the score they gave in that area. vi. Blake: it comes down to the formula that is used to average the scores. vii. Kyle: is there a way to validate the score that person gave to that line? viii. Blake: we can try to change the formula, but we will have to do that for all applications which will take time. ix. Thomas: would you like to update the formula? x. Andrew: I believe if we update the formula, it should be applied to all applications so it's a fair scoring. c. Habitat i. Thomas: does anyone have comments? ii. Kyle: I'm interested to see what other people thought of the costs of this program. iii. Kyle: my take on the cost of this program was that it was not fair or appropriate.That's just the maximum cost per person. iv. Sarah: that was a difficult part of the scoring. It's hard to compare apples to apples. v. Lynn: I had to look at Peewee and Empowerment's costs to try to understand the magnitude of the funds requested. I put a spreadsheet together and my recommendation is that something like this is used for the future. It would be great to know how many employees they are hiring for these projects. vi. Kyle: If I'm being honest, I don't have historical data so scoring them all their missions are great. I went back to review what my scores were saying and make sure they were representative of my voice. Habitat has a very high per individual cost, so money doesn't go very far. vii. Blake: My concern is that the purpose is to score objectively.