Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
157 <br /> 158 N.Trivedi requested a friendly amendment about base assumption,signage,and signal at the university intersection,and a <br /> 159 statement addressing the environmental watershed conditions. <br /> 160 <br /> 161 Motion to approve with additional changes, motion seconded. <br /> 162 <br /> 163 J. Mayo dissents"just to record that we shouldn't widen 70"although he recognizes it will happen and this plan gives our <br /> 164 communities protections for the upcoming development.A.Cole votes for approval.S.Appel votes for it without approval <br /> 165 for the widening.A.Cole told consultants that the report was extremely well done.The consultant advised several <br /> 166 recommendations could be used regardless of widening.G.Woloszczuk advised he approved but is opposed to putting a <br /> 167 left turn lane at the University intersection. <br /> 168 <br /> 169 Motion to approve:A. Menius.Vote: 8 in favor. J. Mayo dissented. <br /> 170 <br /> 171 i.Action:Approval. <br /> 172 <br /> 173 Motion to adjourn without discussing other items because it was 8:53 p.m. <br /> 174 <br /> 175 8.Adjournment-The next meeting—June 17th,2024 <br />