2025_08_13 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID:42EBBFD1-A372-4270-8931-878516787035 Propeldress 517 Lancaster Road Parcel ID or Abstract 9835436624 Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value due to incorrect data on the current property card and the condition of the home. Current Assessed Value $230,300 County Opinion $230,300 Time of Hearing 1:26 PM Appellant Opinion $160,000 County Representative Louise Benson- Board Decision Continue appeal to a later date Lochner Evidence submitted by the appellant: • The Appellant filed a formal appeal on July 23,2025. The Appellant stated"My property data is incorrect,and I would like to request a field review/site visit from a county appraiser: There are several condition issues with the house; including roof damage,roof shingles blown, gutter and downspout damage,ceiling stains and other ceiling damage,railing damage. I attempted to add photos,but the system wasn't allowing me to upload and would then give me an error message,preventing me from submitting. I'm going to email pictures separately." Evidence submitted by the county representative: • On July 29,2025, a site visit was performed by this appraiser. The tenant was in attendance and allowed access to the interior of the home to observe grade, condition/maintenance, and construction standards. Photos were taken of the exterior of the home,the interior showing ceiling damage, and the kitchen for a point of reference for condition and updates. • The residence was built in 1972 (53-years-old),the current effective year built is 1992 (33- years). This effective year built would signify that there would be components in need of maintenance and repair, such as roofing. • It is the appraiser's position that no additional reduction to the current assessed value is warranted based on the evidence provided. • Current Property Record Card of Subject • Proposed Property Record Card of Subject • Photos of Improvements • GIS Map Motion of the Board Continue the appeal to allow the appellant the opportunity to provide valid comparable sales data Made the motion Leon Meyers Seconded the motion Saru Salvi Voted For Richal Vanhook Voted Against Property Identification: Property Owner I Steven Gordon Appellant(if different)