Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-08-2004-9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 06-08-2004
>
Agenda - 06-08-2004-9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 7:11:50 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:43:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/8/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040608
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Multi-famil Fee M <br />Each Basic Fee unit receiving multi-family services would also receive the Multi-family Fee (Same <br />ratio as Basic Fee). In the case of fraternities and sororities, each would receive 7 (M) fees. For EAL <br />facilities, if the (B) fee is 4 units equal one Fee, then the M fee will be also applied as 4 units equal one <br />(M) fee,. <br />Urban Curbside Fee (U <br />Each Basic Fee runt receiving urban curbside services would also receive the Urban Curbside Fee <br />(Same ratio as Basic Fee).. If the (B) fee is 4 units equal one fee, then 4 units equal one (LI) fee also. <br />Staff does not believe that square footage is a good sun°ogate for a fee for residential units. Square <br />footage does not seem to correlate to waste production or recycling usage for residences. Nationally, <br />however, non-residential sector square footage does seem to strongly correlate when used in <br />conjunction with type of use (i.e. warehouse, travel agency, grocery store, convenience store, etc.). <br />Should the Board of Cornmissioners wish us to make other assumptions regarding any of the above, <br />staff would welcome such guidance,. <br />2. Would there be a policy to address low-income residents unable to pay the fees? <br />The WRI2RF proposal presented on April 13 does not contain provisions related to means-testing in <br />cases involving low income or an inability to pay.. The proposal currently assumes that any <br />governmental jurisdiction may choose to pay all or part of airy fee on behalf of any individual or group <br />residing in that jurisdiction. As noted by the County Manager at the April 13 meeting, the County has <br />historically not waived any fees, but has provided other means to pay those fees.. For exanzple, Habitat <br />for Humanity maybe required to pay impact fees for homes they built and then can be reimbursed <br />from a different fund, rather than the County's waiving the fees. In the event the Board of <br />Coinrnissioners wishes the County to serve the role of assessing the ability to pay and <br />facilitating/subsidizing pcyments, staff has provided an outline as to how that maybe done, <br />Approximately 18 months ago, based on concerns from the BOCC about helping citizens who might <br />have an inability to pay ambulance bills, staff (Revenue, DSS and Budget) devised ali EMS Assistance <br />Program. This prograni involves staff from the Revenue Department doing referrals to the DSS staff <br />for determination of income qualification, upon receipt of a request from a citizen who may request <br />assistance in clearing an EMS bill because of their inability to pay it. Eligibility criteria are based on <br />the 200% poverty level determined by Medicaid. The DSS budget includes a line item through which <br />the EMS bills of qualified individuals can be cleared.. Staff propose to work toward devising a similar <br />program to be able to assist eligible individuals in the payment of the proposed WI2RRF and to bring <br />back to file BOCC at a later date the program for approval. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.