Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
53 <br /> 4. The requested variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the ordinance, such <br /> that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is achieved. <br /> As it would seem that most all of the original structures around Lake Orange lie in a non-compliant <br /> zone, consideration must be given to residents attempting to create dwellings in a safe, viable state. <br /> Further, the spirit of the numerous other variances and waivers granted by the board of adjustment <br /> and Orange County Planning Department over the years has created the expectation that adjacent <br /> properties would be accorded a similar courtesy as the need arises. The variance we are requesting <br /> will not, in our view, have any negative implications to public safety. <br /> (attach additional sheets as necessary) <br /> Exhibit D — Intended Evidence* <br /> ❑ I intend to make only arguments and no further evidence is expected to be necessary. <br /> ❑✓ I intend to offer the following evidence: <br /> I intend to introduce the following document and have attached it follows: <br /> Exhibit #1 entitled: Exhibit showing setbacks, buffers, property lines, septic fields <br /> This is relevant to standards from Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Sections: 3.3 (AR zoning) <br /> It demonstrates that: <br /> it isn't feasible to construct the proposed home within these constraints. <br /> Intend to call the following as a lay witness: <br /> Lay Witness #1 (name): <br /> Their intended testimony has been included in an affidavit attached as Exhibit: <br /> This witness has personal knowledge of and will testify about: <br /> This testimony is relevant to standards from UDO Sections: <br /> The testimony will demonstrate that: <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br />