Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
38 Draft <br /> 1 there's a buffer on the south that, so that really describes three sides of the potential location for <br /> 2 the building. So, Beth, if you have a concern about where else the building could go, then a <br /> 3 condition on that remaining open side would be something to do. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Jeff Scott: Well, based on what we've heard from county staff, and everything is that there are procedures in <br /> 6 place to say that if this structure gets moved significantly to another location, then the applicant <br /> 7 knows that they're kind of taking on the burden of they may have to reapply, or they may have to <br /> 8 go through more processes. To a certain degree maybe it's not our place to review, but it is also, to <br /> 9 a certain degree it is on the applicant knowing that the county had a plan in place to deal with <br /> 10 these issues. That's my thinking. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Leon Meyers: Okay. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Beth Bronson: The Waste Management component in the application, it says to refer to the original SUP, but the <br /> 15 original SUP says that there will be no facilities. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Beth Bronson: So that's what's hard for me to understand, I guess. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Leon Meyers: All right, board members, any questions, discussion? Then the matter is before the board. <br /> 20 Procedurally, James, can you help me here. A first motion would be to approve or deny the <br /> 21 standards considered. Is that right? <br /> 22 <br /> 23 James Bryan: So normally we do the facts first. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Leon Meyers: Findings first. Okay. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 James Bryan: And I think that's Attachment 5, Pages 62 to 65, but the record will be clear. It's the application <br /> 28 that's been submitted and the testimony heard today. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Leon Meyers: The findings you said on Page 65. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 James Bryan: 62 to 65, 1 think. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Leon Meyers: 62 to 65? Okay. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Patrick Mallett: Sort of pivoting to it if you so choose, we can go through our staff evidence to the findings to <br /> 37 support your findings of fact, and then we pivot to Attachment 5 in the agenda packet. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Leon Meyers: Okay. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Patrick Mallett: And I don't necessarily need to review Attachment 4. You can see it in front of you. We don't <br /> 42 register good, bad, or indifferent or give a recommendation. All we do is we go down the list and <br /> 43 cite out all of the particular general and specific findings and then the performance standards and <br /> 44 the completeness and the notifications that all of those items were met, check, check, check, in our <br /> 45 staffs opinion. It's not an indication of good or bad, it's just a finding of fact. It's just a reference. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Leon Meyers: All right. Any other discussion, board members? A first motion would be to approve. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Jeff Scott: Do we have to close the public hearing, or, no? <br /> 50 <br /> 38 <br />