8.13.25 BOA Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

35 Draft 1 2 Jeff Scott: So, I guess, maybe that's a question for you, and then also the county is that this is still somewhat 3 conceptual plan. I mean things could move around. If, for example, like the sheds or the batting 4 cages those are much more movable type thing. 5 6 Vishwanath Patil: Yeah. The only site plan is the batting cage. Everything else is conceptual.As Pat mentioned we 7 were putting in this non-compliance as compliance items in the SUP. Might as well propose what 8 we have in future in plan. Right? 9 10 Jeff Scott: I guess my question probably specific on the toilets is that based on the size you don't necessarily 11 know what the fixture count is and what not as septic fields can be pretty large, and I guess the 12 question is although this is conceptual, if it was to move to the south for example or something like 13 that, what is the threshold for saying this needs to be re-approved or what does that look like 1 14 guess? 15 16 Patrick Mallett: Yeah, there's a margin there. We have, per our UDO, we have minor modifications to a site plan 17 and major modifications. If you remember the Camp Chestnut Ridge case, they had a very small 18 change to the plan, but even that calls to major modification to the site plan, because you're talking 19 about structures. I think it would be important if you want to give some sort of definition to where 20 that's acceptable on the site plan or not, probably want to make that part of your approval 21 22 Jeff Scott: Well, and that's the one part where I'm kind of trying to figure to out procedurally, because I'm just 23 looking at it and I'm seeing the easement, and I'm seeing the fields, and I'm seeing the other 24 property, and I'm like, okay, I'm not the designer of this project, but septic fields and/or repair field 25 takes up a lot of space and if it was to come back and say it's not going to fit there, we need to 26 move it X distance, does that trigger administratively something else where they either have to 27 come back? 28 29 Patrick Mallett: You guys probable got some thoughts on that, but we only have to go with what we have in hand. 30 31 Jeff Scott: Sure. I understand. 32 33 Patrick Mallett: And in some cases you deliberate and decide on a box, or the parameters where it can't get any 34 closer to X number of feet from the right of way, or the property line, or whatever. 35 36 Cy Stober: For the record, Cy Stober, planning director for the county. Section 2.7.14 allows for minor 37 modifications of an approved special use permit site plan, and that is a change of no more than 38 5 percent in the total area of a structural footprint and no more than 5 percent of a relocation into a 39 regulated area. So, that would be an established buffer, a regulated flood plain of course, or a 40 regulated area of use, in this case recreation fields or the parking area. There are also some 41 stipulations regarding parking in that that are minor modifications. Anything else is a major 42 modification of a site plan, and as Pat pointed out, Camp Chestnut Ridge is a case study in just 43 how hands on we are about reviewing those. So, what we've done both with special use permits 44 and conditional zoning cases in the last year or so is have conditions that allow for another location 45 provided they don't create a conflict with other uses or create some sort of visible presence to the 46 public that didn't create externality, as we say in planning. There's no new presence, lighting, odor, 47 exhaust, etc., but there's flexibility with that condition that could allow for modification on the exact 48 location of a structure. That is not currently a condition of approval. 49 50 Greg Niemiroski: I have a staff question. The septic fields themselves are not part of the location. That's a health 35