Browse
Search
8.13.25 BOA Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
8.13.25 BOA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2025 10:33:12 AM
Creation date
8/8/2025 10:30:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/13/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
25 Draft <br /> 1 you to hear our case before even deciding if you want to give them any continuance. Because he's <br /> 2 also a realtor, so he can also talk to what they have spoken about. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Leon Meyers: I'm not sure I understood you. You do not object to the notion of a continuance. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Vinitha Cardoza: We object. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Leon Meyers: You do object? <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Vinitha Cardoza: Yeah, we do. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Leon Meyers: Okay. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Vinitha Cardoza: Because we want to present our case today and we would be grateful if you can make a decision <br /> 15 about continuing both because we have already gone to a lot of pain to get this SUP. This is just <br /> 16 where we present the case for changes we're doing, and it is not a permit as people are talking. <br /> 17 So, if you could hear us and then say okay, what we are presenting is valid or invalid, we'll let you <br /> 18 decide, but we really object to this continuance, and we would like to get a decision and end the <br /> 19 case today. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Leon Meyers: Thank you. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Vinitha Cardoza: Thank you very much. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Leon Meyers: Can I ask the staff to talk to us about the notion of a continuance before the board moves forward <br /> 26 here? <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Patrick Mallett: All I can really say is that we have had continuances in the past. In fact, this particular or the <br /> 29 original special use permit was held over three meetings, some of which went well beyond <br /> 30 midnight. The chair can remember. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Jeff Scott: And just refresh me in my memory because I was asking Leon earlier. I believe we reviewed the <br /> 33 original SUP. Was that 2020?Was the definition of standing different then. Correct? <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Patrick Mallett: Those statutes and the 160-D requirements have tightened it up in accordance with state law, yes, <br /> 36 that is true. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Jeff Scott: Okay. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Patrick Mallett: So, you had and will have material at that initial approved Special Use Permit that you took in to <br /> 41 consideration. The board at that time took into consideration. This has a many numbers of things <br /> 42 that they're seeking to modify with regard to the site plan and the conditions. At the end of the day, <br /> 43 none of the discussion would nullify the current special use permit. I think that's obvious, but it's <br /> 44 worth stating just so everybody understands that. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 Leon Meyers: Okay. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Patrick Mallett: I would like to sort of walk you through what got us to this point, if I might. I think it might be worth <br /> 49 your consideration very quickly. So, last Fall two of the property owners pointed out to me, like <br /> 50 hey, we've got this credit field. It's been operating, but we have some objections to certain things, <br /> 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.