Browse
Search
2025_07_23 BOER Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Equalization and Review
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025_07_23 BOER Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2025 10:18:36 AM
Creation date
8/8/2025 10:17:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/23/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
2025-07-23 Agenda
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Board of Equalization and Review\Agendas\2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Docusign Envelope ID:55C8A716-89E4-4018-AB48-1F92375EE447 <br /> provided a vertical equity analysis to assess whether lower value homes are being overvalued, and <br /> higher value homes undervalued. County assessors are analyzing results of the study. If on review, an <br /> issue is determined,the assessors will identify the properties affected by the issue and define value <br /> changes needed,then present the findings to the Board. <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner Epsilon of Phi Gamma Appellant(if different) George Smith <br /> Delta Inc. <br /> Property Address 1 108 W. Cameron Street Parcel ID or Abstract 9788364372 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on the value of comparable properties. <br /> Current Assessed Value $2,592,800 County Opinion $2,592,800 <br /> Time of Hearin 2:01 PM Appellant Opinion $2,075,200 <br /> County Representative Roger Gunn Board Decision $2,592,800 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The representative for the appellant states in the appeal form that their opinion of value was <br /> based on comparable properties. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • Per our appraisal consultant, "This is one that is so specific in location that the value probably <br /> needed more of a push upward. I included two very old sales,but they are adjacent or nearly so <br /> and are very,very similar. Adjusted even 3%/yr. for time,they would indicate a much higher <br /> value per square foot than the current assessment. A small counterbalance is that 108 W. <br /> Cameron is large, and we don't know what the condition is. Overall,the sales support the <br /> assessment or a higher value." <br /> • Photograph of Subject <br /> • Location Map of Subject <br /> • Current Property Record Card of Subject <br /> • Sales Comparison Approach for Subject <br /> Motion of the Board Accept the Coun 's recommendation of no change in value <br /> Made the motion Saru Salvi <br /> Seconded the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Voted For Leon Meyers <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner I M4 Property Management Appellant(if different) Brian McGregor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.