Orange County NC Website
workshops, one in Chapel Hill and one in Hillsborough. The workshops were open house <br /> style and allowed for individuals to come and participate as they were able. The <br /> workshops began with an introduction station to get people acquainted with the trails <br /> plan project. Following the introduction station, four main visioning stations were <br /> developed. Each station provided input on different aspects of the trails plan. Finally, <br /> participants filled out an exit feedback survey. Hernandez presented some of the data <br /> regarding participation. There were 28 total registrations and 48 total sign-ins during the <br /> workshops. It was noted that while there were 48 registrations, many people brought <br /> members from their household that did not sign in separately. Participants were asked <br /> to indicate where they live on a map, and it revealed that there were significant portions <br /> were no participants were represented. Maggie Moriarty commented that many <br /> individuals were unable to attend in person, but that an online feedback form could <br /> illicit feedback from a wider audience. Cason noted that a Qualtrix survey could be <br /> useful for rural engagement. Stancil would like to see more popup events to reflect <br /> input from unreached communities. Parker recommended advertising at the facilities <br /> frequently mentioned as gathering places, indicated by participants during the <br /> workshop. Xilong Zhao noted that the workshops were widely advertised, but <br /> engagement could be increased by utilizing more visual advertising, such as a video. <br /> Louise Flinn agreed that during the workshop, participants were largely drawn to the <br /> workshop that included photos. Peason informed that the next steps will be to develop <br /> the guiding principles. The principles will be created based on data sourced from the <br /> workshops. These will be the foundation of the plan. In the next four months, the plan <br /> will be drafted, then seek alignment and engagement. In October the consultants will <br /> present to the Board of County Commissioners. <br /> b. FY 2025-23 Capital Investment Plan —Stancil presented the Capital Investment Plan. <br /> The plan represents a general framework for spending over the course of 10 years, but <br /> only year one is operationalized. The CIP reflects intentions and priorities.The CAP has <br /> deferred many DEAPR projects, as a 300 million dollar school bond, and 100 million in <br /> additional funding has been allocated to the school system for renovations. Stancil <br /> outlined the proposed deferrals in the CIP, as they relate to DEAPR. While the <br /> Soccer.com expansion has been deferred, Orange County School System as has the <br /> County for rights to that land to build a new school. Flinn asked if the land previously <br /> intended for a Soccer.Com center was reallocated for school development, what would <br /> happen to the funds used to purchase it? Stancil informed that the land was purchased <br /> using funds from Lands Legacy and Soccer Super Funds and that no conversation has <br /> been held regarding that aspect.The County Commissioners will deliberate the vote on <br /> the final CIP. While several projects were deferred, several items are still in the <br /> framework to receive funding, including Central Recreation Center renovations, and the <br /> Mountains to Sea Trail. <br /> Report of the Director <br /> c. Project/Program Updates—The County has renewed a five year contract with <br /> SportsPlex. <br /> Council and Committee Reports <br /> a. Intergovernmental Parks Work Group—next meeting scheduled for April 9, 2025 <br />