Orange County NC Website
Approved 9.4.24 <br />underground line shown as well and an easement over them, so we have the assurance 274 <br />that we can continue to have electricity. Thanks. 275 <br />Adam Beeman: I assure you if you call Duke, they'll give you a copy of that easement. 276 <br />Jamie Cox: It's Piedmont. I’ve asked for the contact from the developer’s engineers a couple of times 277 <br />and haven’t received any input from that, so happy to talk to Piedmont directly. 278 <br />Adam Beeman: I'm saying because when I had to sign up years ago back in 2008 I have a copy of my box 279 <br />that's the Duke Piedmont easement giving the right-of-way so there's going to be a 280 <br />document that Piedmont has in their possession that says that they have a right -of-way 281 <br />with your property so if you're really concerned about it, I'd contact Piedmont directly and 282 <br />see if they couldn't get that information for you. 283 <br />Jamie Cox: Yeah, absolutely happy to do it. It's more than likely going to change since they can see 284 <br />that electricity line is going directly through one of the lots, my assumption is it'll go to one 285 <br />side or the other, so we'd just like to see that change depicted on the plat. 286 <br />Adam Beeman: Marilyn, any questions? 287 <br />Marilyn Carter: Not at this moment. 288 <br />Adam Beeman: Statler? 289 <br />Lamar Proctor: Just so I understand, it's just an up or down approval, right? 290 <br />Patrick Mallett: That's right, and this is not a legislative process that you're going, this is a subdivision 291 <br />process, so you'd have to point to an element that they're not meeting as a requirement in 292 <br />Section 7 of the UDO. 293 <br />Lamar Proctor: Okay. And you've reviewed it, and you don't find anything inconsistent with Section 7 or 294 <br />Article 7? 295 <br />Patrick Mallett: That's correct. And we have worked with Mr. Cox, and we've made that aware to the 296 <br />developer, the surveyor does a lot of work in Orange County, and really the utility provider 297 <br />and the owner, if something goes wrong from Point A to Point B, they're on the hook to fix 298 <br />or rectify that situation so that it doesn't disrupt service to an adjacent owner. 299 <br />Lamar Proctor: Who is the utility provider? 300 <br />Patrick Mallett: PEMC, Piedmont. And then with the wells and septics they're required to provide a 301 <br />certain level of analysis to evidence that it could be supported. As an added step the 302 <br />subdivision process gets you to the point that you can record the lots, you still have a land 303 <br />disturbance permit that you have to factor in, you still have well permits for all the 304 <br />individual lots that you have to get reviewed and approved by Environmental Health, you 305 <br />still have the septic permits that have to get reviewed and approved. They've done what 306 <br />is typical of this type of development, it is a bit of a gamble on the developer's part 307 <br />because they don't have those permits in hand, but they obviously feel, they've done 308 <br />enough due diligence to feel comfortable enough to proceed with the design as they 309 <br />proposed. 310 <br />Chris Johnston: I have no questions. 311 <br />Adam Beeman: Charity? 312