8_7_24 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 9.4.24 du-sac with single family lots flanking it and then open space around the perimeter and to 232 the rear, that round object at the end of the cul-du-sac is a storm water control measure, 233 an SCM that would account for their pre-post runoff in terms of water volume runoff and 234 nutrient removal. This is where we are in the planning board process. As I said, it would 235 move on to the board of county commissioners. Staff analysis is the application was 236 deemed complete. We determined the property is sufficient size, that it meets all the 237 requirements of the subdivision section, Article 7 of UDO, and staff supports the approval 238 of the flexible development option contained in Attachment 1. Plan director recommends 239 that you receive the application, recommend approval for the preliminary plat as 240 submitted. Any questions for me? 241 Adam Beeman: One person from the public wants to speak. 242 Jamie Cox: Hi again, thanks for allowing me to speak. I'm Jamie Cox, owner of the adjoining property 243 at the end of the cul-du-sac. Just wanted to mark a couple of things for the record. 244 Appreciate the additional analysis that was done on the soils for the property. I think 245 that’s very helpful. Didn't exactly answer the concern we had about the impact to the well 246 on adjoining property so just wanted again to note that for the record. The other is that 247 the preliminary plat shows the electric service that actually goes over or the overhead 248 wires and then stops. It does not show the undergrounds wires that actually takes the 249 service to our property. We had asked the developer and the planning staff to consider 250 depicting the underground utility service and providing an access and utility easement 251 over that utility service to our property. We were told that's not the planning department's 252 job, which is fine, but I bring that to you since we'd like to continue to use electricity at our 253 house. But that’s our only concern other than what we've already stated, so appreciate 254 you guys. 255 Adam Beeman: Thank you. 256 Charity Kirk: Can you clarify your concern? You're concerned about the well water capacity on the 257 adjacent property. As well as you receiving electricity because there's no electrical 258 easement noted. 259 Jamie Cox: Correct. 260 Charity Kirk: Okay. 261 Jamie Cox: Well said. 262 Adam Beeman: Let's start down this way, Dolores, do you have any questions? Whitney? 263 Whitney Watson: One quick question. I believe it was presented before was the question about the 264 easement to the circular drive along the southern border of the development. Was that 265 resolved so there is road access back to your property, is that correct? 266 Jamie Cox: It's difficult to see but our property is actually served by a private driveway that runs along 267 the southern portion of the property and it's our understanding it's not included in this 268 development application, it will continue to be maintained privately, so we don't have 269 concerns about the vehicular access. The concern that I share with you now is just 270 making sure that we have utility and electric access because it's not depicted on the pla t. 271 And what we were told is that will get worked out, don't worry about it, and that's fine, but 272 since it's going to be depicted, since this is showing electric service, we'd like the 273