8_7_24 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 9.4.24 recommendation from the Planning Director, and then ultimately make that 149 recommendation to the BOCC on the Statement of Consistency and the proposed 150 ordinance. So, if any of you have any questions for me, I am also up here as well. 151 Statler Gilfillen: I do have one question. Could this be considered in zoning a step down of less intensity 152 which we're approving tonight, or is this equal intensity, just something different? 153 Because I'm reading it and I'm listening to you, it sounds like what they're asking for is a 154 less intense situation. 155 Lauren Coffey: Correct, it is a down zoning back to their original designation from their rezoning to a 156 master plan. 157 Statler Gilfillen: Thank you. 158 Adam Beeman: The question was, we have potential to see them in the future to come back under a 159 flexible zoning, so this is just the step you have to take to get to that point. 160 Lauren Coffey: Yeah. 161 Adam Beeman: You got that? 162 Statler Gilfillen: Yeah. 163 Adam Beeman: Okay. Thank you, any other questions? All right. 164 Lamar Proctor: I move to approve the zoning change and adopt the statement of consistency as drafted 165 by planning staff and finding that the zoning change is consistent with the comprehensive 166 land use plan and reverting it back to a zoning designation consistent with the surrounding 167 parcels. 168 Statler Gilfillen: I'll second that. 169 Adam Beeman: All good? I just wanted to make sure I didn't have corrections from staff that we missed 170 something in the statement. 171 Patrick Mallett: The only thing to point out is the zoning was done several years ago, we've made 172 changes to the subdivision ordinance, they've got a workable option based on the realities 173 of economics and their need, but yeah, this is the first part of several processes that they'll 174 have to go through. I would also note that they have been in discussion with county 175 commissioners and with DEAPR on dedicating a significant amount of conservation area 176 on the property. 177 Chris Johnston: I just want to note, just so we don't appear flippant, you're requesting R1, you're 178 completely surrounded by R1, you're going conventional, so we're not going to have any 179 stipulations that we're allowed to put on it. I mean, it's pretty cut and dry as far as we can 180 tell on this. Just so you don't feel like we're sweeping you along or anything like that. 181 Patrick Mallett: Yeah, and they are fully aware that once the zoning is approved that it extinguishes all the 182 rights that they had gained with the previous zoning. 183 Statler Gilfillen: And moving forward they then have to come back to us again for approvals. 184 Patrick Mallett: Possibly, depends on whether they're a major or minor subdivision. 185