Browse
Search
8_7_24 Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
8_7_24 Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2025 1:11:19 PM
Creation date
8/4/2025 1:11:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 9.4.24 <br />Patrick Mallett: Yeah, so it is possible, but you also have to keep in mind that even if we did do that the 511 <br />state process requires that a registered surveyor survey the ridge line and attest to the 512 <br />boundary, so it relieves some of the bureaucracy in terms of planning and zoning, but it 513 <br />doesn't provide much relief for the property owner, they would still have to get a surveyor, 514 <br />take it through, we'd have to notify the state, put it on a BOCC agenda to amend. That 515 <br />process is above and beyond the zoning boundary. 516 <br />Lamar Proctor: So, Perdita, what I hear you saying is to do something like that you'd have to basically 517 <br />overhaul the UDO and the comprehensive plan, or the FLUM and change the whole 518 <br />scheme in order to do something different. 519 <br />Perdita Holtz: Yes, and it would be a big job. It wouldn't necessarily require notification to all property 520 <br />owners in the county if the board of county commissioners agreed to do what's called a 521 <br />large-scale map amendment that requires just large newspaper ads, but it would still be a 522 <br />big effort. It would be more than 10 minutes at the planning board meeting. 523 <br />Lamar Proctor: Thank you. And should we handle these separately? 524 <br />Patrick Mallett: Separately, they're separate cases. I can move on and brief the other one then you'll need 525 <br />to act separately on each case. 526 <br />Lamar Proctor: Should we do a motion on this one? 527 <br />Chris Johnston: Dolores still hasn't had an opportunity. 528 <br />Dolores Bailey: No, I was just going to say, we probably need to go ahead and take a motion on this one. 529 <br />Adam Beeman: I would prefer to settle this one and we can deal with the last one. 530 <br />Chris Johnston: I make a motion to recommend approval and adopt the statement of consistency by 531 <br />planning staff on Attachment 6 and the proposed ordinance and send it to the Board of 532 <br />County Commissioners. 533 <br />Dolores Bailey: Second. 534 <br />MOTION BY Chris Johnston to approve the Zoning Atlas Amendment. Seconded by Dolores Bailey . 535 <br />MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 536 <br />Adam Beeman: All right, approved. 537 <br /> 538 <br />AGENDA ITEM 10: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT (OVERLAY DISTRICT) - To review and make a recommendation 539 <br />to the BOCC on a County-initiated zoning atlas amendment to amend the boundary of the 540 <br />Watershed Protection Overlay District on a parcel located at 711 Faith Way Road, Mebane 541 <br />within the Cheeks Township (PIN: 9835-67-1605). This item is scheduled for BOCC public 542 <br />hearing on September 5, 2024. 543 <br />Patrick Mallett: Because of the similarities, I'm going to skip over some of the steps here. 544 <br />Adam Beeman: I just have one person from the public that signed up, so when we get to that point. 545 <br />Jessica King: I’ll wait and listen to what you have to say. 546 <br />Patrick Mallett: Okay, property owner? 547
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.