8_7_24 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 9.4.24 Patrick Mallett: Where do you stop? I mean, it would keep going and we need to have the process start 395 with the property owner and a surveyor. You have to have a surveyed boundary and a 396 surveyor attesting to the fact that that's the ridge line and it could keep going, we have 397 some adjacent property owners and I think one of them is going to contemplate whether 398 it's worth it for him to go through the same process. It's the property to the south of this 399 one. 400 Lamar Proctor: What's the practical result of moving it in terms of property use? 401 Patrick Mallett: It's simple but nuanced. Simple question with a nuanced answer. I think for larger 402 properties, not too much. In the second case you're going to see it had a direct impact on 403 that property owner and what she wanted to do. In this case, I think it has more to do with 404 the engineer pointing out if there's any development activity on this property or the smaller 405 lot, Lot No. 2 on this survey, there are implications that would apply in terms of impervious 406 to Lot No. 2. Ultimately the land disturbing activity on these properties would require a 407 land disturbance permit, a storm water analysis and so it has more to do with, from the 408 engineer's perspective, in that analysis I want to show pre and post-development, which 409 way the water's breaking and do my analysis accordingly versus running that analysis on 410 an arbitrary line that defies the laws of physics. 411 Lamar Proctor: Got it, thank you. 412 Patrick Mallett: Staff has determined the application is complete, staff reviewed the considerations of the 413 request, and it adheres to the principles of the Orange County 2030 comprehensive plan. 414 We went through the notifications like we would with other rezoning requests, signs, 415 notices, and put it on our website. And this is where we are. We went through planning 416 staff review, the DAC review, comments from other departments, and then this would get 417 referred on like other zoning cases to the board of county commissioners. We 418 recommend that you receive the rezoning application deliberate on the proposals desired, 419 consider the planning director's recommendation and make a recommendation to the 420 BOCC on either a statement of consistency or statement of inconsistency in the proposed 421 attachments. Our hope is to get this before the BOCC in time for September the 5th. The 422 next case, when I stop here you can ask questions about this case, then I can move on to 423 the next one. 424 Adam Beeman: We have two members of the public that want to speak on number 9. 425 Lamar Proctor: Is that the next one? 426 Adam Beeman: This one we're on right now. 427 Jerry Blanchard: I’ll decline. All of my questions have already been answered. 428 Adam Beeman: Are you Jerry? 429 Jerry Blanchard: Yes sir. 430 Adam Beeman: The only other member was Frank. 431 Frank Cohen: I also yield my time, Patrick covered everything I had to say. 432 Adam Beeman: All right, perfect. Go ahead Charity. 433