7_10_24 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 8.7.24 record available any time somebody wants to look at it. One of the things that I think Pat 303 and I talked about is an aspect of reporting that information back to the County. The 304 County is left out of that process. Local government is left out of that process via the 305 federal regulations, but it's a piece of information for follow up to verify that the 306 development is doing what it says it was going to do, and so that's another mechanism of 307 making sure that it happens. 308 309 Adam Beeman: Thank you. 310 311 Beth Bronson: The only other condition I would discuss is basically you were explaining about the first 312 responder, you referred to the Goldmine Loop entrance as an emergency vehicle only 313 entrance. 314 315 Scott Radway: Yes. 316 317 Beth Bronson: And is that the original intention and is that an okay condition for the approval? 318 319 Scott Radway: I would say the original intention when we did the first concept, no it wasn't based on 320 where dwelling units were in initial concepts and as they evolved we reached the point 321 where it became apparent that most of our development was going to go out to, and the 322 application you have with the location of dwelling units, neighbors across the street on 323 Goldmine Road, Mr. Fox and his family and their neighbors, when we met with them two 324 times at least, discussed the issue of traffic coming out and being on that road, and so we 325 did explore what mechanism is there for doing an emergency services access entrance 326 only, and so again, back to talking to emergency services and go through all of the other 327 pieces that have to go through there, and as a County, you already have standards for the 328 kind of gated emergency vehicle access that could be used, and so there is both the 329 standard and a model in many places already in the county for that kind of gate piece to 330 occur. We have thought about where it might be, along that entrance road, how it would 331 make possible for somebody who makes a mistake to get into the site and turn around 332 safely, so the gate might not be right at the edge of the property. It might be internal to 333 the property some distance, but the goal and the effect would be to keep all of the 334 Fiddlehead Corner traffic going out onto Morrow Mill Road. Back to your back and forth 335 and the discussion among yourselves and with the community, is if you think that's 336 inadvisable with the issues around the neighborhood, I'd suggest that you put that within 337 your recommendations. 338 339 Beth Bronson: Thank you very much for providing those responses and clarification. 340 341 Adam Beeman: So, we're going to head to public comment. There's a time of 3 minutes. We have one 342 person that was granted 12 minutes to speak. She will speak first. I'm going to call three 343 names. If you guys just want to come up, stand in the line and we can move through this 344 because if everybody here speaks we have 3 hours of public comment. I need to ask that 345 if it's redundant and repetitive, please just say I agree with so and so and we can kind of 346 get through this. I'm not trying to strip you from your time, but to hear you say it over and 347 over again it's going to be a long night. 348 349 Charity Kirk: Should they clarify the topic they're supposed to be speaking about. 350 351 Adam Beeman: We're just going to let them have their 3 minutes. 352