Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 8.7.24 <br /> <br />Patrick Mallett: The zoning is the only one. 1850 <br /> 1851 <br />Perdita Holtz: Well, the UDO text amendment also. 1852 <br /> 1853 <br />Patrick Mallett: Yep, sorry. 1854 <br /> 1855 <br />Adam Beeman: 7, we don't need a statement of consistency. 1856 <br /> 1857 <br />Lamar Proctor: 8, do we need a statement? 1858 <br /> 1859 <br />Perdita Holtz: You need to give your rationale on why you're denying a text amendment. 1860 <br /> 1861 <br />Lamar Proctor: Okay. And then 9, obviously we do. Got it. I make a motion to deny the application as to 1862 <br />Agenda Item 7. 1863 <br /> 1864 <br />Chris Johnston: I second that motion. 1865 <br /> 1866 <br />MOTION BY Lamar Proctor to Deny Agenda Item 7. Seconded by Chris Johnston 1867 <br /> 1868 <br />IN FAVOR: Adam Beeman, Lamar Proctor, Charity Kirk, Chris Johnston, Whitney Watson, Liz Kalies, Steve 1869 <br />Kaufmann, Statler Gilfillen 1870 <br /> 1871 <br />OPPOSED: Beth Bronson 1872 <br /> 1873 <br />MOTION PASSES 8 TO 1 1874 <br /> 1875 <br />Lamar Proctor: All right. I make a motion to deny the application as to Agenda Item No. 8, that it is 1876 <br />inconsistent with the comprehensive land use plan and adopt the statement of 1877 <br />inconsistency as presented by the Planning Department. 1878 <br /> 1879 <br />Perdita Holtz: There isn't a statement of inconsistency for 8. Just give a rationale on why. 1880 <br /> 1881 <br />Lamar Proctor: So, I make a motion to deny the application as to Agenda Item No. 8. Part of that is to 1882 <br />codify on which future land use classifications MPD-CD may be applied. So, the rationale 1883 <br />would be that extending MPD-CD zoning to rural activity nodes is inconsistent with the 1884 <br />comprehensive land use plan. 1885 <br /> 1886 <br />Adam Beeman: Do I have a second? 1887 <br /> 1888 <br />Chris Johnston: Seconded. 1889 <br /> 1890 <br />MOTION BY Lamar Proctor to Deny Agenda Item 8. Seconded by Chris Johnston 1891 <br /> 1892 <br />MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY 1893 <br />Lamar Proctor: I make a motion to deny the application as to Agenda Item No. 9 with the statement that it 1894 <br />is inconsistent with the comprehensive land use plan and adopt the statement of 1895 <br />inconsistency as presented by the Planning Department and its attachment. 1896 <br /> 1897 <br />Adam Beeman: Do we have a second? 1898 <br /> 1899