Browse
Search
7_10_24 Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
7_10_24 Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2025 1:11:12 PM
Creation date
8/4/2025 1:10:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 8.7.24 <br /> <br />Chris Johnston: I would make a motion, and this is to put a flag up. The motion is to reject the three 1800 <br />agenda items as presented and submit to the County Commissioners as such. 1801 <br /> 1802 <br />Statler Gilfillen: Will second that. 1803 <br /> 1804 <br />Beth Bronson: Each one of these needs to be an individual motion? 1805 <br /> 1806 <br />Adam Beeman: Perdita is going to clarify for us. 1807 <br /> 1808 <br />Perdita Holtz: It would be good if you could do three separate motions, and if you could use the words 1809 <br />approve or deny instead of reject. 1810 <br /> 1811 <br />Chris Johnston: Okay. I make a motion to deny Agenda Item 7 and submit that to the Board of County 1812 <br />Commissioners. 1813 <br /> 1814 <br />Statler Gilfillen: Second that. 1815 <br /> 1816 <br />Chris Johnston: All of these seemed tied together, so, just to confirm, we're doing this three separate 1817 <br />times? 1818 <br /> 1819 <br />Perdita Holtz: You need to, for a couple of them state why you're doing it, not for the comp plan, but for 1820 <br />the rezoning. You have to state why you're doing it. There’s a statement of consistency 1821 <br />and such. 1822 <br /> 1823 <br />Chris Johnston: Sure. Of course. 1824 <br /> 1825 <br />Beth Bronson: So, before you finish with that motion, because I think you're on the right track, I would 1826 <br />like to make a motion to extend the meeting time. Like 15 minutes, if needed be, up to 1827 <br />10:30. Just making sure because we have three different motions to go through. 1828 <br /> 1829 <br />Chris Johnston: I was planning on doing all three in tandem because I think all three of them depend on 1830 <br />each other. 1831 <br /> 1832 <br />Adam Beeman: If we get to 10:00 here we'll vote on a push out. 1833 <br /> 1834 <br />Patrick Mallett: Just to clarify, we'll do them in succession, but they're different applications that have 1835 <br />different case numbers, so we could do them in rapid succession, but they really do need 1836 <br />to be three separate items. And ’its approval or denial on all, as Perdita said, on the 1837 <br />zoning case, you need to have a statement of inconsistency or consistency. 1838 <br /> 1839 <br />Chris Johnston: Lamar, would you mind handling that now? You are so much better at this than I am. 1840 <br /> 1841 <br />Patrick Mallett: You need to articulate why. 1842 <br /> 1843 <br />Adam Beeman: We'll start with 7. 1844 <br /> 1845 <br />Lamar Proctor: Does 7 need a statement of inconsistency? 1846 <br /> 1847 <br />Perdita Holtz: No, it does not. 1848 <br /> 1849
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.