7_10_24 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 8.7.24 1452 Chris Johnston: And I apologize, could you, just for my own personal clarification, break it out a little bit 1453 more so that star specifically means that we need to… 1454 1455 Perdita Holtz: The star in the table of permitted uses means that it's a permitted use. When you get to 1456 the conditional districts, what it means is that it's a use that can be applied for as part of a 1457 conditional district. So, it would just mean that somebody can apply for that to get 1458 approved as part of their conditional district application. 1459 1460 Charity Kirk: Can we approve just that Amendment 1 in Item 8, right now? 1461 1462 Perdita Holtz: You could recommend that that go forward if you didn't want to approve the other parts. 1463 1464 Charity Kirk: Do we have to do them together or can we just get that done with right now? 1465 1466 Perdita Holtz: It would probably be unlikely since this is a bundled application that staff is going to just 1467 take forward one thing that's not part of this whole bundle of applications. We'll come 1468 back in the fall with this one amendment if things did not go forward at this point. 1469 1470 Chris Johnston: I apologize, I just hate arguing about things that we don't have any control over, that's 1471 what I want to make sure that we're not doing necessarily, like if this is something that is a 1472 state regulation. 1473 1474 Perdita Holtz: I would recommend that you not take out just that one part. We'll come back with a text 1475 amendment, if necessary, in the future. 1476 1477 Adam Beeman: Any other questions or concerns? 1478 1479 Chris Johnston: I have general thoughts and comments and that sort of thing, but are we at the point 1480 where we're summarizing our thoughts or are we still asking questions of the public? 1481 1482 Adam Beeman: I mean, we're looking for a motion so if you're ready for a motion or someone wants to 1483 discuss things, let’s have it. 1484 1485 Chris Johnston: I'm still putting together Agenda Item 8 and I apologize, I thought that that was a little bit 1486 more bundled than it turned out it was, so I need to do a little bit of additional digging 1487 there. In regards to Agenda Item 7, which is essentially growing the pink dot, right? 1488 We're talking about expanding the rural neighborhood activity node. That makes sense 1489 based on the comments that were brought before by the previous planning board, why 1490 they didn't do it by parcels, that makes complete sense now. They didn't do it by parcels 1491 because, and if I misunderstand, I apologize, but they didn't do it by parcels because if 1492 they did then there would be no growth, it would just be whoever is there is there, so this 1493 makes sense in that regard insomuch as if someone comes in, they may be outside that 1494 dot, extending it makes sense to make it in compliance or whatever the case may be. If 1495 I'm misunderstanding that also, please correct me. But the key question here on is 1496 Agenda Item 9, right? Agenda Item 9 is the proposal by the applicant, and I think that 1497 everyone agrees with what Fiddlehead is trying to do there, they are trying to age in place, 1498 they want a community of like-minded individuals who have kind of fun with their 1499 neighbors, they can grow together and have that community, and I think that community 1500 actually in some ways already exists at Morrow Mill, right. There are people there who 1501