7_10_24 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 8.7.24 this development is on Morrow Mill and Goldmine Loop. Emergency road is going to 1402 come out right in front of my daughter's house and my soon to be fourth grandchildren. 1403 Come out and please drive down Goldmine Loop, it still has gravel on it, it's still a gravel 1404 road in places. So, we moved out there to be in a rural area, rural community, and all 1405 those people along Goldmine Loop. They're going to put 300 people on 30 acres and no 1406 offense to them, but they're saying that the other 60 acres, two-thirds of this is going to be 1407 less forested. We all know that cannot happen. You cannot put a road in there, you 1408 cannot put sidewalks in there, berms in there, storm water drainage, and if they can dig a 1409 well there that gets 40 gallons a minute, they need to go into the well drilling business, 1410 because I've never heard of that before, that's not happening out there. I was not 1411 opposed to this initially; I just was listening with an open mind. Thanks for listening. I'm 1412 not as eloquent as all these other people but this is going to affect our lifestyle, 10 years 1413 of construction, please, 10 years. Thank you. 1414 1415 Adam Beeman: Thank you. That concludes the public conversation, we're going to close the public 1416 comments and discuss amongst the board and see if we can't hash this out. Elizabeth, 1417 do you have any questions or concerns? 1418 1419 Chris Johnston: What are we doing here? 1420 1421 Adam Beeman: Work your way through, we have a motion one way or the other. 1422 1423 Beth Bronson: Have any comments on the public comments, maybe we'd like to discuss any of this. 1424 1425 Chris Johnston: Sure, I do want clarity real quick, because it was brought up in the previous meeting. Item 1426 8, in regard to how it, and I'm sorry, I'm used to looking at Cy and then Cy looks back at 1427 me, who am I looking at here today in terms of talking about Item 8? This is the one 1428 where we need to be in alignment with state law. Is that an accurate representation or is 1429 that an inaccurate representation? 1430 1431 Charity Kirk: The family care, care facilities and, and master planning district. 1432 1433 Lamar Proctor: It's Agenda Item No. 8. 1434 1435 Perdita Holtz: So, the UDO text amendment, it's in the abstract. When we were researching it, we 1436 determined that state law requires that you cannot discriminate against family care homes 1437 if they're allowed in any residential area, they need to be allowed in all the residential 1438 areas or in a zoning district that allows residential, which MPD-CD does. It was an 1439 oversight when MPD-CD was created back in 2010 to not have the little star there 1440 indicating that you can apply for that. So, even if that text amendment does not get 1441 approved at this point, at some time staff will be back to add that tick mark to that. 1442 1443 Chris Johnston: But to confirm, tonight, this is in front of us, to put us into alignment with state regulations. 1444 One way or another this has to occur unless we do what? There is no unless we do what, 1445 correct? 1446 1447 Perdita Holtz: The text amendment, that stipulation, has multiple parts in the UDO. The part that I just 1448 described about having a little star in the table of permitted uses is the one thing that will 1449 have to occur at some point, whether it's part of this action or whether it's part of a future 1450 action initiated by staff. 1451