Browse
Search
7_10_24 Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
7_10_24 Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2025 1:11:12 PM
Creation date
8/4/2025 1:10:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 8.7.24 <br /> <br />unit, the project would generate a bit more than 30,000 gallons per day of sewage. The 903 <br />project proposes a high-tech solution to provide onsite waste management. Such 904 <br />solutions are not free from failure. If the sewage system of the project should fail, the 905 <br />company would have to condemn the existing drawings and provide water and sewer to 906 <br />the outreaches of the county. 907 <br /> 908 <br />Adam Beeman: Thank you, unfortunately, time is up. 909 <br /> 910 <br />Colin Austin: Thank you, my name is Collin Austin. I'm the chair of the advisory board on aging here in 911 <br />the county. We sent a letter to the planning department outlining our support for this 912 <br />project. Our board supports this project because it was created by seniors for seniors, 913 <br />and in response to many of the goals in our county master aging plan. I'd just like to 914 <br />highlight three aspects. First, it increases accessibility for people regardless of age or 915 <br />disability, incorporating wide doorways, handrails, level entries. Only a small fraction of 916 <br />the housing stock in Orange County currently meets this criteria. Second, the 917 <br />development enhances social interaction for older adults; has walking trails, outdoor areas 918 <br />for recreation and events, community garden; and third provides a continuum of care in 919 <br />the community to ensure that the needs of the community are covered and that would 920 <br />allow community members to age in place with their increasing care needs rather than 921 <br />forcing them to leave the community. We believe this is an important proposal, seniors 922 <br />helping seniors age in place, instead of seniors living in isolation or being relocated to 923 <br />facilities with little or no connection to any community. Thank you very much. 924 <br /> 925 <br />AGENDA ITEM 8: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENT β ADD FAMILY CARE HOMES AS 926 <br />PERMITTED USE TO MPD-CD ZONING DISTRICT AND ASSOCIATED AMENDMENTS β To continue review and make a 927 <br />recommendation to the BOCC on applicant-initiated amendments to the UDO pertaining to Family Care 928 <br />Homes. The BOCC public hearing date is βto be determined.β 929 <br /> 930 <br />Adam Beeman: Thank you. So, this next item is the UDO Text Amendment referring to the family care. If 931 <br />you have comments on that, we're going to go through this group right now. 932 <br /> 933 <br />Dan Eddleman: This agenda item is based on the premise that the entire region encompassed by Orange 934 <br />County has no provision for family care homes and that the rural neighborhood activity 935 <br />nodes located throughout the county ought to be exploited to permit such use. My first 936 <br />speaking to you about rural activity nodes states why that's inconsistent to use that kind of 937 <br />rural activity node for this. Here is why. The assertion that the Orange County region has 938 <br />no provision for high density family care homes and is an omission needing correction is a 939 <br />mistaken assertion. By design, the UDO mandates that high density residential housing is 940 <br />to be where water and sewer, transportation, and other infrastructure is in place and in 941 <br />fact accommodated in the municipalities by the use of R5 and other zoning categories. 942 <br />Chapel Hill and Hillsborough have accommodated many variations of such facilities, some 943 <br />for the most advanced healthcare needs, some for 55-plus senior living facilities, and a 944 <br />number with specific requirements for affordability. Examples are, as many recent news 945 <br />articles point out, these reports include the Legion Road Residential Community Priority 946 <br />Conditional Zoning that was approved for such use. Other similar facilities are located in 947 <br />Chapel Hill where the required infrastructure is in place and make frequent use of R5 948 <br />zoning. Just to quote a little bit about the Legion Road from Chapelboro.com, the Chapel 949 <br />Hill Town Council unanimously proposed a resolution for the project at 1708, 1712 Legion 950 <br />Road Development that will provide affordable housing property to accommodate 951 <br />affording housing units for, and over the age of 55 and that is a legally binding 952
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.