7_10_24 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 8.7.24 region. We hope you, the Planning Board, will keep these considerations in mind as you 603 deliberate. Thank you. 604 605 Ralph Warren: Good evening and thank you for this opportunity. My name is Ralph Warren. My spouse 606 and I own land on the eastern boundary of the application, and we've lived on our land for 607 50 years. We're in a neighborhood of four households within one hundred and nine acres 608 of land. I have lived in Orange County since 1954, with the exception of 7 years of 609 Raleigh residency. My spouse moved to Chapel Hill in 1944. These speakers are here to 610 address incompatibility of this application with existing County ordinance and planning. I 611 want to offer a view of the affected surrounding community as a need to understanding 612 our community and its land use. I have used GIS information to identify the landowners 613 and the acreage of properties that form a continuous land area bounded by Six Mile 614 Road, NC 54, Morrow Mill Road and Goldmine Loop Road. Each of these properties has 615 frontage on one of the listed roadways. The land area within this Bingham Township 616 segment is six hundred and sixty acres, and there are 18 households currently occupying 617 those adjoining lands. That total includes the 90 acres under discussion tonight. If the 618 requested classifications were to be granted, one hundred and fifty residences would be 619 added within 30 acres of those six hundred and sixty acres. The incompatibility of the 620 proposed high-density urban housing development is obvious on paper as well as my 621 drive through this area. Part of our community population is made up of families who 622 have lived a rural lifestyle on their land for multiple generations. Those of us newcomers, 623 whether 50-year or 30-year or recent residents, chose to locate here in order to join and 624 continue the existing lifestyle. We do not fit the conventional description of a 625 neighborhood, but we do form a strong community. Our members have come together on 626 many occasions to successfully protect our rural character as prescribed by consecutive 627 land use plans and successive boards of Orange County commissioners. This application 628 plan would attract residents drawn to an inward focus as opposed to those wishing to 629 meld with the longstanding lifestyles and values of the surrounding community. Dense 630 placement of the 200 or more residents together in an area with more expanded services 631 will be an open invitation to rapid commercial development. Granting the changes 632 requested by the current application would ease the path for such incompatible growth 633 both here and across the county. Our community residents are not opposed to 634 development that maintains the rural nature of our area. A long succession of Orange 635 County Boards of Commissioners and their land use plans have specified and maintained 636 rural agricultural zones in Orange County, including our area. So, we, as residents, ask 637 that you reject this current application, and thank you very much for the opportunity to 638 speak. Thank you for your time. 639 640 Dan Eddleman: My name is Dan Eddleman, adjacent landowner, senior citizen, aging in place in Bingham 641 Township, agricultural and multi-generation community for the past 45 years. My past 642 service to the county was as a member of the Bingham Township Advisory Council, 643 Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, and was a strong advocate for the extension of 644 zoning into all of Orange County. The above experience was during this era commented 645 on in the first meeting of the County to our planning agreements with Chapel Hill, 646 Hillsborough for water supply planning protection, for municipal throughfare planning, and 647 for development of best management practices for growth, where it should and should not 648 occur. The rural buffer zone serves as a bit of a demarcation of the types of development 649 that good land use planning would dictate be close to, or within the municipalities, and of 650 what is permissible and not permissible in the areas outside of the rural buffer. Rural land 651 node classification and zoning is an integral part of this question. In the June 5th meeting, 652