6_5_24 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 7.10.24 Scott Radway: It's not their property. 1219 1220 Lamar Proctor: It's not y'all's property? 1221 Scott Radway: It's not part of this application. The person who owns that could speak to that if you want that 1222 as an answer. I can say how the pieces of property fit together in a fashion. 1223 1224 Lamar Proctor: Sure. 1225 1226 Scott Radway: One point that may have gotten lost in the process is, the staging process, which we have one 1227 here, goes and fits with some of the ordinances that the County has and some of the considerations about 1228 emergency services and other things. So, you have Phase 1 in Pod 1, which you saw. We have an entry from 1229 Morrow Mill Road that comes into that, and along that edge, there is a contract agreement to provide an opportunity 1230 to connect from the center property to that property, and there is a relationship buffer that you can't quite see in here 1231 of a set back from the property line, and that's part of a contract agreement with that property owner. 1232 1233 Chris Johnston: One of those slides does show the Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 with the colors. 1234 1235 Scott Radway: Sorry, I'm trying not to page through too many slides. So, Phase 1, 50 dwelling units relates to 1236 a well and it relates to traffic volume, and it relates to a number of other things. Phase 2, which is another 50 units, 1237 relates to emergency service needs and where, at that point, you need two entrances for emergency services to the 1238 site. So, that brings us to the point where we have primary entrance on Morrow Mill Road. We have a secondary or 1239 minor entrance, if you will, on Gold Mine Loop Road that needs to be active for the third phase to be started. So, that 1240 needs to be connected at that point in time. You see a funny setback of the property line over there. That's actually 1241 a strange, but perfectly functional form, of having a wider right of way along that road so that the property owner that 1242 owns the remaining 35 acres here in the center can have individual lots in areas that have good soils, and they can 1243 have access to this secondary entrance or this roadway where we anticipate substantially less traffic in and out, even 1244 at full completion. The property's zoned AR. It's a bona fide farm at this point. It can do all the things that a bona 1245 fide farm can do with its property, or it can develop residential, and so that's sort of the relationship. One is to be 1246 compatible, connective, and still let the property owner from whom this larger piece was bought do what he wishes to 1247 do for his family and his children in the future. 1248 1249 Lamar Proctor: And the applicant's proposed amendment will expand RNAN through the crescent-shaped 1250 property that's the subject of tonight, correct? 1251 1252 Scott Radway: Yeah, correct. 1253 1254 Lamar Proctor: And so, any future zoning of that is a separate question and would be, if it was brought into 1255 MPD-CD zoning, it would have to go through the same process. 1256 1257 Cy Stober: Yes, absolutely. To be frank, it was included in the initial application but due to its bona fide 1258 farm use and the limitations zoning might place on that versus the existing AR zoning and its farm status, my 1259 recommendation to the applicant was to remove it from the application. 1260 1261 Lamar Proctor: Okay, thank you. There was also a small portion that was in the resource protection overlay in 1262 one corner of the property, so I was wondering how that was addressed or how that was taken into consideration into 1263 the site plan. 1264 1265 Scott Radway: Does it show up on this slide, or is it in the one that's the more environmental slide? 1266 1267 Lamar Proctor: It's in our overlay on the future land use map. 1268 1269