6_5_24 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 7.10.24 otherwise would use for those purposes. Thank you for your time and attention. We'd ask our H4D members who 1067 are in the audience to stand up and show you who we are. 1068 1069 Lamar Proctor: Thank you for that presentation. If it's any consolation to the applicant, this particular board is 1070 very robust in its questioning so I imagine that any information you feel you didn't get an opportunity to present you 1071 will get to explore with this board, so is the board ready to move to the question portion for the applicant? 1072 1073 Chris Johnston: Will we be following our normal procedure going down the line? 1074 1075 Lamar Proctor: Yes. All right, so Statler if you'd like, do you have any questions? 1076 1077 Statler Gilfillen: I do have one, and going through all the information, and I see a lot of good in your proposal, 1078 but the schedule is there, the numbers of units, can you give me some idea of what the estimated budget when this is 1079 completed will be? What is the financial impact in Orange County for this, approximately? 1080 1081 Edwin Cox: I estimated the total budget is between 60 and 75 million for full build out to the 150 units but 1082 it's going to be in phases so that will be comparably less for each phase. 1083 1084 Statler Gilfillen Thank you. 1085 1086 Lamar Proctor: Ms. Carter? 1087 1088 Marilyn Carter: Mr. Chair, I have several questions, so I don't mind deferring to the other end of the table to 1089 come back my way. 1090 1091 Lamar Proctor: Let's stick with the normal protocol, because you may ask questions that others are planning 1092 to ask that will get answered. 1093 1094 Marilyn Carter: Okay, thank you. Well, first off, thank you for the extensive preparation. Your packet, I think it 1095 made for a lot of very good reading for all of us over the last number of days. I really appreciate the time that it takes 1096 to put something like this proposal together and of course the staff's time as well. Because we do look at the 1097 comprehensive plan very closely, I have a question about future land use in the comprehensive plan that I'll ask in a 1098 moment. I did want to, I have several questions, one has to do with a why, in terms of the consideration for the 1099 conservation cluster, and it may be Statler to chime in here, but with respect to the proposal and the MPD-CD 1100 designation, was there a compelling reason why a structure like that, such that was approved recently for the 1101 Stonewall project, which was also a conservation cluster using AR zoning, I believe, is there a compelling reason why 1102 that wasn't pursued in this particular zoning request? 1103 1104 Cy Stober: So, I can speak to our analysis, which is two-fold. One is any subdivision creating more than 1105 20 lots is required to pursue some sort of rezoning. So, the recommendation in the UDO is residential conditional 1106 district; however, master plan development, because it's a large complex subdivision featuring multiple housing 1107 types, the definition of master plan development includes large subdivisions and multi- and mixed-use developments. 1108 The incorporation of the community center and the family care facilities, and my interpretation, and this was, Tom can 1109 attest to, a subject of robust discussion among the staff, my interpretation was the MPD-CD was the most 1110 appropriate zoning district to be applied to what Hands Four was proposing. 1111 1112 Marilyn Carter: Okay, thank you. 1113 1114 Charity Kirk: What were the other options? 1115 1116