Orange County NC Website
Approved 7.10.24 <br /> 812 <br />Edwin Cox: I think we would like to be able to use a little bit more time to get the display of information that addresses 813 <br />your questions up. 814 <br /> 815 <br />Charity Kirk: So I think it's in your notes that you have to officially request it. 816 <br /> 817 <br />Edwin Cox: We officially request it. 818 <br /> 819 <br />Lamar Proctor: At the beginning of your presentation our Rule E sub a says should an applicant anticipate 820 <br />needing more than 30 minutes to present their applicant's, the applicant shall state their requested time allocation at 821 <br />the beginning of their presentation and the planning board shall determine by a majority vote whether additional time 822 <br />be allocated. 823 <br /> 824 <br />Charity Kirk: So how much time do you want? 825 <br /> 826 <br />Edwin Cox: An additional 15 minutes, 45 minutes. This is a very complicated proposal. 827 <br /> 828 <br />Charity Kirk: Oh, we know, we've been through complicated proposals before, that's why we set these 829 <br />rules. 830 <br /> 831 <br />Chris Johnston: I make a motion to accept the additional 15 minutes. 832 <br /> 833 <br />Beth Bronson: Second. 834 <br /> 835 <br />Lamar Proctor: Any discussion? 836 <br /> 837 <br />Dolores Bailey: I do want us to remember that we stop at 10 no matter what so we're cutting the public off if we 838 <br />give them the extra 15 minutes. 839 <br /> 840 <br />Lamar Proctor: Right, as we stated, I anticipate this will take multiple sessions so the public will get an 841 <br />opportunity to speak if not tonight then at the next session. So, any other discussion about expanding the time from 842 <br />30 to 45 minutes. 843 <br /> 844 <br />Whitney Watson: Mr. Proctor, I think that since this information was available in advance that the applicant 845 <br />should have known that they had 30 minutes. I am reluctant to shortchange the public , however, we may continue 846 <br />this discussion to a future meeting. We have practical experience where the second and sometimes third meetings 847 <br />are not as helpful as when we have everybody here, so I really advocate for holding to the 30-minute limit. 848 <br /> 849 <br />Lamar Proctor: All right, any other discussion? 850 <br /> 851 <br />Statler Gilfillen: I would respectfully differ with the gentleman. I spent 432 pages, I got this yesterday and I 852 <br />spent most of today reading through this. It is very easy to miss a single detail like that. In all the documents, all the 853 <br />proposals and all the legalese, I'd like to, even though it means extends, and I want to hear the public, don't get me 854 <br />wrong, but I don't want to shut off this organization for 15 minutes or a half an hour longer so that they can make their 855 <br />presentation fairly also. 856 <br /> 857 <br />Beth Bronson: With that said, would you consider including your motion to extend the meeting until 10:15? 858 <br /> 859 <br />Lamar Proctor: So we have a seconded motion to extend the applicant's time to 45 minutes, any further 860 <br />discussion before I take a vote? I'm hearing none, all those in favor of extending the applicant's presentation to 45 861 <br />minutes raise your hand. All those opposed raise your hand. Okay, I believe it's opposed, you have 30 minutes. 862