Browse
Search
6_5_24 Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
6_5_24 Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2025 1:10:51 PM
Creation date
8/4/2025 1:10:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 7.10.24 <br />Lamar Proctor: No, that means, they will not. If you don't sign up tonight, even if we go multiple sessions, if we go 456 <br />to July, you can't sign up to speak at the public comments section in July. These agenda items are what were 457 <br />started, and this sign-up sheet is the totality of those who have signed up for public comment. Regardless if we go 458 <br />June, July and August. 459 <br /> 460 <br />Dolores Bailey: And are you going to give an opportunity for a member of the public who sits there and then 461 <br />decides they want to sign up to sign up? 462 <br /> 463 <br />Lamar Proctor: No, once we start the public comment portion, and I think that's fair, unless anyone disagrees, to 464 <br />leave the sheets out until we begin the public comment portion and then we'll take them up and then we'll begin 465 <br />hearing public comment, the sign-up will be closed at that point. 466 <br /> 467 <br />Beth Bronson: Acknowledging that there is another public comment period during the BOCC's public hearing. 468 <br /> 469 <br />Lamar Proctor: Right, this is not the final answer on this project. We make our recommendation and it goes 470 <br />forward to the Board of County Commissioners. 471 <br /> 472 <br />Marilyn Carter: Mr. Vice Chair, my point of view is that someone may hear something in comment and then have a 473 <br />point of view about it. 474 <br /> 475 <br />Statler Gilfillen: Can we do it this way? If they are here this evening, can they sign up to the end of tonight to 476 <br />speak, even though it may mean that the next time instead of censoring it or stopping it right before anybody speaks, 477 <br />just be flexible. 478 <br /> 479 <br />Lamar Proctor: Well, I think for efficiency purposes, because we collect the sign-up sheets and begin the process, I 480 <br />think people during the presentation if they hear something that they want to comment on, they can sign up for that 481 <br />item but once we begin, my plan as Chair would be to take up the sign-up sheets once we begin the public comment 482 <br />portion. 483 <br /> 484 <br />Charity Kirk: You're welcome to pass on your sign-up on speaking too, if you don't have anything to talk about. 485 <br />We don't mind. 486 <br /> 487 <br />Dolores Bailey: So after we're done talking about 7 we can't talk about it again, that's what you're saying. 488 <br /> 489 <br />Lamar Proctor: Yeah, I mean, that'll be it, once we collect the sign-up sheets at the beginning of the public 490 <br />speaking portion, that's it, so I just want the public be aware that they need to sign up now if they want to be heard as 491 <br />to these agenda items, because we will not have an opportunity to sign up again in July or in August if this goes into 492 <br />multiple sessions. And that has been our general practice just so everyone knows that this has been our rule is that 493 <br />those who sign up when we begin the agenda items are the ones who are permitted to speak, you can't come in 494 <br />halfway through the process and then sign up. 495 <br /> 496 <br />Chris Johnston: Returning to the staff presentation, to confirm on Item 3, the proposal brings the Orange County 497 <br />UDO in conformance with the intent of NCGS 160D, we're just aligning the state definitions, correct, so really, there's 498 <br />not a whole lotta discussion there. We have to follow the state requirements for family care facilities, correct? 499 <br /> 500 <br />Cy Stober: So, the application brought this to light, that we were not in conformance with the statute, and to be 501 <br />fair, the statute was adopted in 2021 so it's still fairly recent, and this was a new update. 502 <br /> 503 <br />Marilyn Carter: Just a point of information in our process, if the board is in agreement with an item earlier versus 504 <br />later and perhaps once we get to the point of staff's presentation completing, would that be something we would vote 505
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.