Browse
Search
12_4_24 Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
12_4_24 Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2025 1:10:30 PM
Creation date
8/4/2025 1:10:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 2.5.25 <br />Tom Altieri: And then we met at the Jones Grove Missionary Baptist Church which is just a little bit north of 438 <br />town here, the American Legion, Gravelly Hill and then Voices of Efland Cheeks helped us with 439 <br />the meeting at the Efland Cheeks Community Center. So, we mixed it around and if you recall 440 <br />during our first engagement window, we did have a meeting down in Chapel Hill at Southern 441 <br />Human Services Center. So, we are trying to move it around a little bit. 442 <br /> 443 <br />Leigh Anne King: Have different locations for each of the rounds of engagement. 444 <br /> 445 <br />Tom Altieri: And there has been a request during the next window that we have another meeting in Chapel 446 <br />Hill, and that was made by the County commissioners. 447 <br /> 448 <br />Dolores Bailey: Thank you. 449 <br /> 450 <br />Beth Bronson: I wasn't sure if we were going to go around. I guess to that point, to Adam's original, initial 451 <br />question encouraging density where they don't have jurisdiction. But then also that would lead you 452 <br />to think that the policy that they developed is what they do have control over which is the 453 <br />unincorporated areas that are bordering municipalities. 454 <br /> 455 <br />Leigh Anne King: Right. 456 <br /> 457 <br />Beth Bronson: And did the commissioners have any kind of comments on those? 458 <br /> 459 <br />Leigh Anne King: Yes. I think there's still support for the fundamentals of the current policies that are in place, but 460 <br />this idea of providing some approaches to encourage conservation subdivisions to happen in 461 <br />unincorporated Orange County that could provide both the protection of important lands as well as 462 <br />development of different housing and potentially and hopefully different housing choices to, kind 463 <br />of, increase the housing stock across the County. That was really the new idea brought to the 464 <br />table and encouraged, supported by the Board with respect to what they can do within the 465 <br />unincorporated areas and are willing to provide some support for. 466 <br /> 467 <br />Beth Bronson: Okay. And to that question, did the applicant for the housing conservation subdivision on 54, did 468 <br />they go to the commissioners already? I don't know if you know this question. 469 <br /> 470 <br />Leigh Anne King: I don't know that question. 471 <br /> 472 <br />Cy Stober: Right now, the tentative hearing date is February 4. 473 <br /> 474 <br />Beth Bronson: Okay. 475 <br /> 476 <br />Cy Stober: And that's what we're planning on. 477 <br /> 478 <br />Beth Bronson: I wasn't sure if that had happened or not. 479 <br /> 480 <br />Cy Stober: And that was the applicant's request. 481 <br /> 482 <br />Beth Bronson: Makes sense. And you're saying about the conservative subdivisions over the idea of providing 483 <br />municipalities with denser housing options by ceding unincorporated land into the County, or into 484 <br />the municipalities, right? Like annexation? 485 <br /> 486 <br />Leigh Anne King: I think that the idea was that the more dense housing choices being provided within the 487 <br />municipalities based on what the current planning areas are of those communities. So, as 488 <br />modeled we made some adjustments to Hillsborough's to reflect their current comprehensive plan. 489 <br />They actually shrunk their growth area in a few places so that's reflective there. Mebane has a 490 <br />larger study area, so there could potentially be annexation as part of that. And then Chapel 491
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.