Browse
Search
12_4_24 Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
12_4_24 Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2025 1:10:30 PM
Creation date
8/4/2025 1:10:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 2.5.25 <br />development of private water and wastewater systems. If you look at the summary of the long 275 <br />survey responses and look at them by each of the alternatives, about 58 percent are satisfied with 276 <br />the current approach to land use. So, that's that first alternative, the baseline. That's your 277 <br />currently adopted policy. About 58 percent said that's a good approach, and again, we weren't 278 <br />asking them to pick one of these or to necessarily compare them. We were asking folks to look at 279 <br />each in isolation and say whether or not they supported it. So, that's important to understand. For 280 <br />Land-Use Alternative No. 2, that's the one where we were really focusing on strong environmental, 281 <br />agricultural watershed protection. Majority respondents, 54 percent said that they really supported 282 <br />that focus within this alternative. Looking at No. 3 and No. 4 and we list them here together 283 <br />because there are some overlaps, particularly on how water and wastewater are provided and the 284 <br />employment areas. So, the majority, 52 percent, support encouraging new rural conservation 285 <br />neighborhoods, and I'll talk a little bit more about that in just a moment. Support is a little bit more 286 <br />mixed or more evenly divided between some of the other aspects. When you look at those that 287 <br />support development of private water and wastewater systems to support rural conservation 288 <br />neighborhoods, so that would not be OWASA or Town of Hillsborough municipal services. That 289 <br />would be a private system that would be developer built to serve a particular development. 290 <br />There's not a lot of that in Orange County. Other communities do allow for that type of thing, and 291 <br />it is currently allowed within Orange County but it's not something that, again, is often used. And 292 <br />so, there was a little bit of mixed support. 44 percent did support, 39 percent did not support the 293 <br />idea of those private systems occurring to support rural conservation neighborhoods. In terms of 294 <br />the economic development area south of West Ten Road, about 49 percent support. 35 percent 295 <br />did not support. In terms of higher-intensity mixed-use developments and that fourth alternative, 296 <br />about 41 percent supported and about 46 percent didn't support. And then finally looking at 297 <br />extension of public water and sewer, so that would be, OWASA, Hillsborough, Mebane provided 298 <br />services outside of their current service areas within the County. 48 percent supported and 299 <br />41 percent did not support that with respect to providing higher-intensity mixed-use development 300 <br />service. You have a question? 301 <br /> 302 <br />Charity Kirk: So, this was a five-point question, right, one, two, three, four, five? 303 <br /> 304 <br />Leigh Anne King: Right. 305 <br /> 306 <br />Charity Kirk: So, I gather four and five is in support and one and two is do not support. 307 <br /> 308 <br />Leigh Anne King: Yeah. We keep the middle as the neutral point and then on either side there's some level of 309 <br />support for that option. Yep, good question. 310 <br /> 311 <br />Lamar Proctor: Kind of follow up. The long survey was from the in-person participants? 312 <br /> 313 <br />Leigh Anne King: The long survey and the short survey were provided to anyone that wanted to take them, both at 314 <br />the in-person meetings and online. The short survey at the tabling events, as well. We were really 315 <br />trying to provide as many options for people that wanted to participate. The short survey is easier. 316 <br />It's, kind of, a front and back survey that people can do really quickly, so the majority of people 317 <br />picked that. It's easy, takes a little bit less time, but they can still provide meaningful feedback, but 318 <br />we did get a number of people who wanted to take the time because it does take the time to do 319 <br />the long survey and read through each of the alternatives and think through what the implications 320 <br />of those are. 321 <br /> 322 <br />Dolores Bailey: Leigh Anne, this is great. Just a quick question. We're talking about 510 people, right? 323 <br /> 324 <br />Leigh Anne King: Correct. 325 <br /> 326 <br />Dolores Bailey: That's all we're talking about. 327 <br /> 328
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.