Browse
Search
4_9_25 Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
4_9_25 Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2025 1:08:10 PM
Creation date
8/4/2025 1:07:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/9/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 5.7.25 <br /> 658 Justin Chandler: Yeah. It's been upkept and maintained. So, there shouldn't be any issue with that, but obviously, <br /> 659 we would have to get Environmental Health to come out. <br /> 660 <br /> 661 Beth Bronson: And I guess that goes back to that question that I had if there is an existing well and septic close <br /> 662 enough. <br /> 663 <br /> 664 Justin Chandler: Correct. <br /> 665 <br /> 666 Beth Bronson: But you're not using the residential well and septic? <br /> 667 <br /> 668 Justin Chandler: Yeah, exactly. <br /> 669 <br /> 670 Beth Bronson: Because there's a separate one, but not being incorporated into the 11 acres? <br /> 671 <br /> 672 Justin Chandler: No, it will not be encompassed in the parcel boundaries. <br /> 673 <br /> 674 Beth Bronson: And I'm just trying to understand why you wouldn't do that because it's being used for it. You'd <br /> 675 rather do the easement than include it into the parcel. <br /> 676 <br /> 677 Justin Chandler: Correct. <br /> 678 <br /> 679 Statler Gilfillen: Okay. So, practical matter then, they go across the street to the existing toilets if they need to use <br /> 680 the toilet for this facility? And it is a storage facility. Is that what you're saying? <br /> 681 <br /> 682 Justin Chandler: The toilets would be obviously located on site,within the storage buildings, they wouldn't be <br /> 683 leaving off site to access that. This would be something that is connected by way of an easement. <br /> 684 <br /> 685 Whitney Watson: All right. I, 1 think you should just go back and look in the packet, it's Page 127. <br /> 686 <br /> 687 Ashley Moncado: It says in the ground water assessment that 20 is being the maximum. For the total number of <br /> 688 employees. <br /> 689 <br /> 690 Justin Chandler: Okay. <br /> 691 <br /> 692 Whitney Watson: If it's going to be made that certainly seems like a lot of folks for a storage facility. <br /> 693 <br /> 694 Justin Chandler: Yeah. <br /> 695 <br /> 696 Whitney Watson: But if you're only anticipating two or three,then perhaps Environmental Health should know that <br /> 697 so they can adjust their calculations. <br /> 698 <br /> 699 Ashley Moncado: When this comes back approved,the next step in the process would be to come back through and <br /> 700 to review as a site plan. It would come through the non-residential zoning compliance permit <br /> 701 process. At that point is where all these permits and everything kind of come more into play. <br /> 702 Environmental Health would be having these conversations with them. They would need to know <br /> 703 the employee counts and be going out there to do site visits. <br /> 704 <br /> 705 Whitney Watson: Okay. That's all. <br /> 706 <br /> 707 Statler Gilfillen: I have several technical questions. How many individual different units do you plan on having. I'm <br /> 708 just looking at the plan. I can't tell any square footages or spaces. How many units are in here? <br /> 709 <br /> 710 Justin Chandler: I believe the proposed building dividers are actually being quoted and finalized now. The current <br /> 711 configuration, I believe, is 226. <br /> 712 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.