Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 5.7.25 <br /> 604 <br /> 605 Meg Millard: The one connection is the impervious surface transfer? <br /> 606 <br /> 607 Cy Stober: Yes, but that's a civil matter between property owners, and we do administer that, and we provide <br /> 608 it as an option, but ultimately it does need to be recorded as an obligation between two property <br /> 609 owners in this case, or between properties and that, essentially it would function similar to a <br /> 610 conservation easement that that area would be dedicated for non-development because it is <br /> 611 serving as the impervious transfer. <br /> 612 <br /> 613 Whitney Watson: I also found that there were some places where the paving for the storage facility wasn't clear. <br /> 614 There are some places where it says it all needs to be asphalt, and some in your application,talk <br /> 615 about number, Size 57 washed stone. So, I'm wondering if that's just an oversight in a <br /> 616 documentation. <br /> 617 <br /> 618 Ashley Moncado: The UDO requires parking to be paved, but the applicant has issued a condition to allow for that <br /> 619 not to be the situation, and that's where the 57 stone has been proposed. As a condition,we will <br /> 620 require the access ways connecting to NC-57 to be paved. <br /> 621 <br /> 622 Whitney Watson: Right. <br /> 623 <br /> 624 Whitney Watson: Okay. And last question has to do with the sizing for the septic system. I think you proposed <br /> 625 perhaps as many as 20 people working there part time. <br /> 626 <br /> 627 Justin Chandler: No, it will be a single employee. <br /> 628 <br /> 629 Whitney Watson: Okay, you might want to look at the application, because it clearly says you expect as many as 20 <br /> 630 people there. For when they did the environmental health calculations it was based on 20. <br /> 631 <br /> 632 Justin Chandler: I think that that's in regard to a minimum. So, in the site plan in the notes, I don't have it right in <br /> 633 front of me, but in the note section on general notes, it speaks to the employee and in regard to <br /> 634 the parking situation, specifically, and it's one employee.And then what five additional parking <br /> 635 spaces, or four additional parking spaces for a total of five. I think for environmental health <br /> 636 concerns, or environmental health calculations, it's kind of similar to traffic where there's a <br /> 637 minimum required proposed. Even if the anecdotal side of it,there's,five people going in and out <br /> 638 a day,there's a minimum per building and what not. I think it's along those lines for that. So, the <br /> 639 existing septic on the facility has been approved for over 400 people.400 spectators for that <br /> 640 facility. <br /> 641 <br /> 642 Beth Bronson: The existing one? <br /> 643 <br /> 644 Justin Chandler: The existing one. <br /> 645 <br /> 646 Whitney Watson: Okay. <br /> 647 <br /> 648 Beth Bronson: It is not currently on the parcel under review, but you would potentially use. <br /> 649 <br /> 650 Justin Chandler: Correct. <br /> 651 <br /> 652 Beth Bronson: If it wasn't irreparable? <br /> 653 <br /> 654 Justin Chandler: Correct. That portion of it has been maintained around that track. <br /> 655 <br /> 656 Beth Bronson: It's technically already there. <br /> 657 <br />