4_9_25 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 5.7.25 549 Ashley Moncado: The single-family home and then the track will remain separate and zoned as AR. 550 551 Beth Bronson: I guess that was my confusion, I think. Thank you. No more questions right now. 552 553 Whitney Watson: Sure. It's great that you have this GIS aerial pulled up. It looks like there's a road that runs 554 through the property to a structure off to the north. What is the structure to the north of the 555 property line, and will that road be continued, will they have continued easement through there? 556 557 Justin Chandler: In regard to this structure that you're mentioning?These are old houses. I mean they've probably 558 been there from the 1800's. Most of them are dilapidated and falling down, but they cut hay in 559 that. They'll continue to have access to it, as it stands, and that road will stay in place because 560 there's, again that is the same access to the single-family residence there. 561 562 Whitney Watson: So, does that access for cutting hay or agricultural purposes, does that need to be somehow put 563 into the conditions for this change? 564 565 Ashley Moncado: That part of the property is not part of this rezoning request. I might have to refer to either Cy or 566 Pat, but it's not part of it,we're focusing on the 11.22 acres that's going through the rezoning. 567 568 Whitney Watson: That's just the storage facility area, right? 569 570 Ashley Moncado: Yes. 571 572 Whitney Watson: Okay. So,the balance will then remain zoned as AR? 573 574 Ashley Moncado: Correct. 575 576 Whitney Watson: Okay. 577 578 Ashley Moncado: And whether there are recorded documents or recorded easements or plats that have the access 579 documented, again,when he comes to the subdivision review process,the surveyor putting the 580 plat together would have those items highlighted and documented on the plat to make sure that 581 the easement and the access is still legally there for them. 582 583 Whitney Watson: Okay. 584 585 Cy Stober: I just want to be clear that, I hope I'm not muddying the waters, but what the board is being asked 586 to review is enabling split-zoning on a single property. There is a proposed subdivision of the 587 property, but that is not part of the discussion tonight, but the split zoning would distinctly separate 588 the storage use from the pre-existing residential and as Justin mentioned some kind of light 589 agricultural uses in that area. 590 591 Beth Bronson: Any future use for the other one? 592 593 Cy Stober: Yeah, there is no action being taken on the larger portion of the property,just that 11 acres. 594 595 Lamar Proctor: Just following up with that. Split zoning can exist within the same parcel. 596 597 Cy Stober: Yes. 598 599 Lamar Proctor: It doesn't require a separate plat. 600 601 Cy Stober: Correct. 602 603 Lamar Proctor: Okay.