Orange County NC Website
Docusign Envelope ID:73800ED4-8534-47B7-912C-2015FEDEFDBO <br /> Property Address 1161 Tramore Drive Parcel ID or Abstract 9779160847 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on the location of the subject property, the lack <br /> of needed updates and lower sale prices for neighboring properties. <br /> Current Assessed Value $1,139,100 County Opinion $1,139,100 <br /> Time of Hearin 1:24 PM Appellant Opinion $1,050,000 <br /> County Representative Kelly Wells Board Decision $1,139,100 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • This home backs onto a field. This field could be sold at any time and turned into a strip mall. <br /> It is zoned as a multi-use property,meaning that there could be grocery stores, apartments, etc., <br /> which decreases the value of this land. <br /> • This home,built in 2006/2007, is approaching 2 decades, and no significant updates have been <br /> made. The kitchen is a Tuscan style kitchen, and so is the main bath. This decreases the value <br /> of the home as new buyers are looking for more updated kitchens and bathrooms. <br /> • We purchased our home on April 1, 2022. At the time,the home was listed for 999,999. In <br /> 2021 and 2022 real estate was going through a turbulent time. It was very hard to find a home <br /> in Chapel Hill due to COVID. We bid over asking price and were actually the only bidders on <br /> the house.All of the other homes in this neighborhood in recent years have sold for less than a <br /> million dollars. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject property is a 4,448 square foot home built in 2006 on.46 acres in Chapel Hill. It <br /> was purchased in April of 2022 for$1,100,000. It is very well maintained and the largest home <br /> that sold in the neighborhood since Jan 1,2021. <br /> • The parcel behind the subject property is currently farmland and is not in use as commercial <br /> property. <br /> • Based on the recent purchase price and more recent sales of similar but inferior homes, the <br /> County recommends no change in value. <br /> • Photographs of the Subject Property <br /> • GIS Map <br /> • Sales Analysis <br /> • Sales listing snippets <br /> • Current Property Record Card of Subject <br /> Motion of the Board Accept the Coun 's recommendation of no change in value <br /> Made the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Seconded the motion Saru Salvi <br /> Voted For Leon Meyers <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br />