Browse
Search
ORC Agenda Packet - July 9 2025
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Ordinance Review Committee
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
ORC Agenda Packet - July 9 2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2025 4:33:32 PM
Creation date
7/14/2025 4:31:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/9/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 2: Procedures 49 <br /> 0 Major Subdivisions <br /> /f�)The QraRge County Fleednloin AdMiRistrater toTevieW COmmnplrt"anGe with <br /> Special Clnerd Hazard Area regulations; <br /> (g) The Plaanniing�gp dd/Department annr Planning Board of the appropriate <br /> m�mini Pali+v where o nnur+ocv review nrOGed pro has been established by <br /> agreement bet\Meen the County and the rn unidpality; <br /> /ham\)The appropriate utility provider whey publiG Or GOMmunity I.Af;-;tP-.r colt/nr <br /> sanTtarse sewerage systems are�repssedse�e fhe subdivision; <br /> The Orange Soil and \A/eter Go-nstewa e ++n reviev.f a general <br /> comic description and interpretation; and <br /> The CGURtyAt�rey to reviewtht--fnr a+-ARd appropriateness e <br /> prepeserd res+rig+iye n nts, herneewners a a+inn agreement-,, <br /> readm in+manse agreements, Perfermance ( Grantees and a+her <br /> molar rdocUmen+s <br /> /41 The r s designated in /31 shall review the Preliminary Plat and shall <br /> p rprn"i�Tppnrt to the Planning Aire(++n�A a f the , �i+ahili+y, provisional <br /> suitability, or unsuitability of the proposal <br /> (5) WFherre-ic666 deteirmonedd +hat utlye measures are required in order for the <br /> proposal to be riasstHed-as "suitable," a_L�rtifica+inn of"provisionally Suitable" <br /> shall be Provided. If reviewer approval iTo,i+hhelthis asis the r r <br /> shall iddentifi,the reasons for andd rennmmen,-d measures <br /> tn, :g„ c i the preposal may be made suitable. Planning Beard m <br /> reGernmeRd an.+ the Beard of Gee inh,rommieaGReF may appreve, identified <br /> measures a endditiens of approval of the Preliminary Plat; provided, hewever, <br /> the y'eGGmrnend'Rg reviewer�has the autherirtty to GRfGFGe s Ugh measures. <br /> of the reev <br /> G\ ewe <br /> / + vs a ailable to address eeneerns + r,a�� ere Re alternatives ,,� <br /> ns'ui-table" shall beprovided. The reviewer shall provide a list <br /> of the reasons Which re,;-it+edl in si Bch designation. <br /> (77) Upon rreGe +ha r--ormr�ments and reGOrmrnmrren`tavations frre—rn reviewers,,tthe <br /> Planning D'Fectnr shall submit to the Planning Beard a written analysis of the <br /> application and! his/her rennmmenda�tiien <br /> (8) The Planning DireOtGF shall be permitted to defer+h�he-aapppl-Ga+in�a <br /> recnmmendat'on for one meeting beyond the Planning Board meeting at which <br /> the application is scheduled to he hears+ <br /> TDPlanning Board Review and Approval Procedares31 <br /> (1)The Planning R.9_Booard shall review the application�n a�_�a_inn rl the Planning Director's <br /> report at a regularly scheduled meeting and shall prepare a written <br /> recommendation to the Rnardd of CA Aty(`nmmissiepers <br /> (2) All interested persons shall be given the epportunity to speak and ask questions <br /> regarding ther�RG+a+inat theeetinngThe Planning Reard may pla8 <br /> reasonable and fair limo+atmens nn cnmmen+s arguments and) questions to avoid) <br /> (3) The Panning Beard shall aOtiGn n s the a.ppppliEatiOR sel ,on its findings E) <br /> complianne with applicable regu Nations and Genditinns andd shall recnrnrnendd• <br /> (a) approval of the applicator <br /> /b)approval with cendditinnG; Or <br /> si A major subdivision either fulfills the county's requirements or not.The County has no legal position to impose <br /> conditions on such an approval. Introducing the Planning Board and BOCC in a discretionary capacity is <br /> unnecessary and could be problematic. <br /> Orange County, North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 2-57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.