Orange County NC Website
Docusign Envelope ID: F93B5E92-3F78-409A-A34B-7C8EB1288609 <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner Tao Li Appellant(if different) <br /> Property Address 248 Abbot Place Parcel ID or Abstract 9870717707 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on a decrease in the median sale price for the <br /> neighborhood from 2023 to 2024. <br /> Current Assessed Value $1,043,000 County Opinion $1,043,000 <br /> Time of Hearin 1:14 PM Appellant Opinion $858,300 <br /> County Representative Roger Gunn Board Decision $1,043,000 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • According to the county website data, from August 2023 ($975,000)to June,August and <br /> September 2024,the neighborhood median sale price had a 10.4%decrease($874,000), 10.8% <br /> decrease($870,000), and 5.1% increase($1,025,000)respectively based on August 2023 price <br /> of$975,000 . From September 2024 to January 2025,there was no recorded data. The assessed <br /> Total Market Value of our property in 2024 was $858,300. We do not see a reason for a jump <br /> of 21.52%to $1,043,000 in January 2025,while the market sales data suggests a flat to 5% <br /> downward trend in general. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject contains 4,729 square feet finished area,has the most finished area of the 62 <br /> homes in the Chandler Woods neighborhood, and most recently sold in September 2024 for <br /> $1,025,000. Its current assessed value of$1,043,000 indicates a sales ratio of 1.018 (101.8%) <br /> which is within IAAO guidelines for sales ratios in a revaluation year. <br /> • All 2024 and 2023 sales in Chandler Woods were included in a sales analysis. Although all <br /> sales have significantly less finished area than the subject,the sales indicate that the subject's <br /> value per square foot is well below that of the sales. <br /> • Similarly, an equity analysis comparing the subject with the three next largest properties also <br /> indicating the subject's value per square foot is well below similar properties. <br /> • It is the County's opinion that no adjustment to value is supported based on either the <br /> appellant's evidence or the County's sales and equity analyses. <br /> • Photograph of Subject <br /> • Property Record Card of Subject <br /> • Chandler Woods Sales <br /> • Sales Analysis <br /> • Equity Analysis <br /> Motion of the Board Accept the County's recommendation of no change in value <br /> Made the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Seconded the motion Saru Salvi <br /> Voted For Leon Meyers <br /> Voted Against <br />