2025_06_10 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID: F93B5E92-3F78-409A-A34B-7C8EB1288609 • The board members were informed of the schedule change for the meeting on Thursday,June 12th. The new start time will be 2:30 pm. Property Identification: Property Owner Sherry c.Webster Appellant(if different) 1 Property Address 12313 White Cross Road I Parcel ID or Abstract 19748756543 Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on the price per acre of neighboring property. Current Assessed Value $477,900 County Opinion 1 $477,900 Time of Hearin 1:00 PM Appellant Opinion $386,800 County Representative Roger Gunn Board Decision $477,900 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • Per appellant's appeal: "Compared value of neighbor's property at 2317 White Cross Rd.with 270,000/8.9 acres=30,337 per acre and our land value is listed at 166,100/3 acres=55,367. 2317 White Cross Rd. has road frontage,where our land does not have road frontage. I am writing to appeal the value assessed to our land. I used GIS to obtain my information." Evidence submitted by the county representative: • The subject is located off the east side of White Cross Road and is accessible by a private drive. As the value of the building was not contested,only the land component of the property's value was analyzed. • A land equity analysis was performed in which the subject was compared with three other similarly situated properties also with private access off a main road. All are located in the same neighborhood as the subject within .5 mile,have the same -10%A-10 land adjustment for access, and have the same AC-9 land pricing at$75,000 for 1 acre. The analysis shows the effect of ranged pricing in the AC-9 land model in which the subject's value per acre is between that of a 2.32 acre parcel and a 3.21 acre parcel. The appellant's comparable was included as Comp. 4 to further illustrate the effect of ranged pricing and economy of scale for a much larger parcel as this property also a-10%E-10 land adjustment for containing an easement and is located near the subject in the same neighborhood. • Location Map of Subject • Property Record Card of Subject • Land Equity Analysis Motion of the Board Accept the County's recommendation of no change in value Made the motion Saru Salvi Seconded the motion Richal Vanhook Voted For Leon Meyers Voted Against