Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
54 <br /> • RED: Lateef Mitchell, Tami Pfeifer, Gayane Chambless, Timeka Harper-Purcell (no chair <br /> selected) <br /> • Advocacy: Caitlin Fenhagen(Chair), Crista Collazo <br /> Conflict of Interest Forms—Please complete the Conflict-of-Interest form and return to Caraina <br /> if you have not already done so. <br /> Program Updates <br /> Dispute Settlement Center—During the past month they had 4 referrals, 1 over age 17. The only <br /> challenges are reaching out and getting in touch with parents. The measurable objectives for <br /> FY23-24 were just under their goal for"clients will enter into a mediation agreement". It means <br /> that it didn't make sense for some particular youth they were working with to have some form of <br /> written agreement. All other measurable objectives were met. <br /> The Exchange Club—For the month of September they received 2 referrals for PTS, which came <br /> from DSS. The currently have 1 family enrolled in the program. They have not had any groups <br /> because they have not received any referrals. Started working with a team to do more marketing. <br /> They meet with Truancy court every month and get a lot of referrals from them. Many of the FY <br /> 23-24 measurable objectives numbers were low for in-home due to the lack of compliance from <br /> program participants. For PTS Group, they met all their measurable objectives except they were <br /> hoping to serve 14 youth and only served 8. They have received 1 referral for the ASAT <br /> program. <br /> Reintegration Support Network—For the month of September, they received 4 referrals within <br /> the last week or two of the month, so they did not get to engage them yet. They are still in the <br /> works of assigning them a mentor and should have some matches in the next week or so. They <br /> did not have any terminations, so they still have 6 currently enrolled in services. Of those 4 <br /> referrals, 2 identified as male from DJJ referrals and 2 as female from their therapists. They <br /> onboarded a new program manager who will be the point person for all referrals. The biggest <br /> challenge is the lag time between referrals and setting up that communication with the parent or <br /> guardian and then with the participant. They met all of their measurable objectives for FY23-24. <br /> Volunteers for Youth—For the month of September, CSR had 2 referrals, 1 admission, and I <br /> successful completion. They began and ended the month with 5. There were no concerns or <br /> challenges this month. Teen Court did not have any referrals for Orange County in September. <br /> They currently have 1 admission and no completions. The biggest concern with Teen Court is <br /> the lack of referrals for Orange County. They have met with local police departments and SRO's <br /> to figure out how to get more referrals. For CSR, they met their measurable objectives for <br /> FY23-34. Some of their numbers were affected by youth moving,being transferred,put in <br /> placement, or dismissed by the court or judge. All of the goals were met for Teen Court. The <br /> number of referrals coming in for Teen Court are very low. <br /> Wrenn House—They received 2 referrals for Orange County in September. Both referrals were <br /> recommended for admission, however, neither came to stay at Wrenn House. For last fiscal <br /> year, their target estimated served was 10 and they actually served 8. The measurable objectives <br />