Browse
Search
6.11.25 BOA Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
6.11.25 BOA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2025 4:18:49 PM
Creation date
6/9/2025 4:16:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/11/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
27 Draft <br /> 1 David Swanson: That's really up for them to look at, because there's not a structure that typically would like a <br /> 2 fire truck would need to get in there. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Beth Bronson: It would be more about how they got out. I understand that. All right. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Leon Meyers: I believe there is a review from emergency services here as part of the package, and their <br /> 7 only comment, if I remember correctly, was that the site needs an assigned address, which it <br /> 8 will get as part of the building permit process. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 T.C. Morphis: We did get an official address. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Leon Meyers: All right. Board members, any other questions for our applicant or staff? Then the matter is <br /> 13 before the Board, and I'll just remind everybody for process here, we would approve the <br /> 14 standards examined,which are on Page 114 of the package. And then we would approve the <br /> 15 findings, which are on Page 121, and the conclusions,which are on Page 123, along the way <br /> 16 considering adding conditions if Board members thinks that's appropriate. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Kyle Myers: I think from a safety perspective, the condition of fire marshal approval is important. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Beth Bronson: I would agree with that. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Greg Niemiroski: Would it also apply for parking? <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Leon Meyers: Well, I think we've, for me, solved the parking issues resolved with Cy's statement. Then a <br /> 25 motion would be in order to approve the standards examined, Page 114. Morgan, please <br /> 26 redirect us if I've got us headed off the road here. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Morgan Pierce: I'm shaking my head yes. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Leon Meyers: Okay. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Beth Bronson: I would make a motion that the standards reviewed, and evidence received referenced on <br /> 33 Page 113 of our agenda packet be approved and are consistent and in line with the necessary <br /> 34 information compliant to the specific standards outlined. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Jeff Scott: Second. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Leon Meyers: The discussion on approval of the standards examined. All in favor, please say aye. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 MOTION was made by Beth Bronson. Seconded by Jeff Scott. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 VOTE: Unanimous <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Leon Meyers: None opposed. The next motion would be findings, and some place in here the motion make <br /> 45 would need to insert the conditions that we've talked about. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Kyle Myers: Can you just say that one more time? <br /> 48 <br /> 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.