Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
27 <br /> 1152 uses in the table of permitted uses,and my rebuttal back to him was this one is fairly unique and <br /> 1153 specific and does need to be called up in my opinion. My last communication with James was I'm <br /> 1154 not opposed to removing the word accessory and it's in this table, but I think it's important. 1 <br /> 1155 haven't heard back from him. In your motion, I would just ask that we have the ability to modify <br /> 1156 the terminology of land use, Item 73, as currently proposed, so long as it is consistent with staff <br /> 1157 attorneys'guidance. <br /> 1158 <br /> 1159 Chris Johnston: I would like to make a separate motion. <br /> 1160 <br /> 1161 Dolores Bailey: Before you make your motion.Where are you talking about? <br /> 1162 <br /> 1163 Chris Johnston: Page 98. Up there is Line 73,that's above 71 and 72 and it has the word accessory in it,though it <br /> 1164 doesn't necessarily need to. <br /> 1165 <br /> 1166 Dolores Bailey: I see it.Thank you. <br /> 1167 <br /> 1168 Chris Johnston: Do we care that 73 is above 71 and 72? <br /> 1169 <br /> 1170 Patrick Mallett: As we discussed earlier,words matter, but I do know that that could go one way or another. <br /> 1171 <br /> 1172 Beth Bronson: He's saying that the row was inserted above Row 71. <br /> 1173 <br /> 1174 Chris Johnston: And then you're saying that because it's got an A at the start of it, it may be at the top, or it may be <br /> 1175 at the bottom. <br /> 1176 <br /> 1177 Patrick Mallett: Yes. <br /> 1178 <br /> 1179 Chris Johnston: I apologize,would you mind repeating your request, so that I might verbalize right back at you. <br /> 1180 <br /> 1181 Patrick Mallett: Yes,the motion could point to that page in this packet and No. 73 as presented in this packet. <br /> 1182 That's one way to do it. <br /> 1183 <br /> 1184 Chris Johnston: Sure. I make a motion that we provide staff with leeway on editing 73 to either include accessory <br /> 1185 or not based on the recommendation of the staff attorney. <br /> 1186 <br /> 1187 Statler Gilfillen: I second it. <br /> 1188 <br /> 1189 Lamar Proctor: All right. We'll take a vote on whether to add this amendment as a separate item before we <br /> 1190 approve the statement of consistency.All in favor of that amendment, raise your hand and said <br /> 1191 aye. <br /> 1192 <br /> 1193 MOTION BY Chris Johnston to allow for revisions pending comments from the Staff Attorney. Seconded by Statler <br /> 1194 Gilfillen. <br /> 1195 <br /> 1196 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY <br /> 1197 <br /> 1198 Lamar Proctor: Hearing none opposed. Now, I'll take a motion on approving the statement of approval and <br /> 1199 consistency with that amendment. <br /> 1200 <br /> 1201 Statler Gilfillen: I so move. <br /> 1202 <br /> 1203 Lamar Proctor: Statler moved. Would you like to second? <br /> 1204 <br /> 1205 Chris Johnston: I would like to second that one. <br /> 1206 <br />