PB Agenda Packet - June 4 2025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

21 825 to provide? A site map or a site plan?Like you have elevation,the site plan and site plan 826 application meeting, so you say you want elevations, and you want a map, and you want a site 827 plan, but you don't say what you want with all utilities at a facility site shall be installed 828 underground. Do you want a map of where the facility's installed? 829 830 Cy Stober: That's a requirement of 2.5,which is not in the packet. All private utilities must be provided on a 831 site plan. That's sealed and delivered to the county. So, that is not proposed for amendment. 832 That's just identifying that all electrical and, in this case,fiber and should there be any other 833 utilities, such as gas,on site, they'd have to be shown on the site plan,whether they are public or 834 private. So, if there's an OWASA sewer line going through there, it must be underground. There 835 cannot be any aerials and no above-ground utilities are permitted on the site. 836 837 Charity Kirk: Well, you've stated with 1, 2, 1, 3 and 4 exactly what you want,which is an elevation, 3 is a map,4 838 is a site plan, 5 is a landscape plan, but 2 is just a statement. So, you might say,for consistency's 839 sake, how you want that to be given to you. 840 841 Albert Benshoff: We need to check the site plan section,which is not before you tonight. 842 843 Beth Bronson: I think the plan is in Section 2.5. It is outlined. 844 845 Charity Kirk: It's an inconsistent use of the bullets. 846 847 Beth Bronson: But on top of E, it does say application meeting Section 2.5. So, you do have to refer to Section 848 2.5, in which case all utilities public or private must have an accompanying site plan that would 849 indicate where those utilities are underground. 850 851 Charity Kirk: So,then why does 4 have a site plan of the wireless support structure showing all of the 852 following? 853 854 Beth Bronson: Because it's above ground and not part of 2.5. 855 856 Charity Kirk: No,that's not a part of 2.5. If you all are happy with it, I'm just saying it's inconsistent.That's the 857 only one of 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 that does not clarify what document format you want it to take. That's 858 all. 859 860 Cy Stober: That's because those are different documents an elevation is a profile of what the tower would be 861 like. 862 863 Charity Kirk: I know what elevation is. 864 865 Cy Stober: That's separate from the site plan. A site plan is a two-dimensional drawing. The utility 866 requirement is a layer that is an additional standard for what utilities may be done on the site plan. 867 The map is a locational map. It doesn't have to be as precise as the site plan. It doesn't even 868 have to be scale. The site plan comment in Item 4 is identifying additional requirements of that 869 site plan. It is redundant with language in E, but the others are not the same drawings as the site 870 plan itself of the property and its boundaries. So, I think the utility comment is an additional layer 871 of regulation beyond our site plan regulations. I'm comfortable with it. 872 873 Charity Kirk: You're comfortable with it. Okay. 874 875 Statler Gilfillen: I have one question on this. When those plans are submitted,they have to be done by a licensed 876 engineer, right,or an architect? Okay. As an architect, those are pretty standard presentations. 877 You can argue about nit-picking which way and what, but if they're not clear,the inspector at the 878 other end is going to send them back to the engineer and they're going to get it done properly. 879 That's tradition.