Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
64 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 540 <br /> 541 Lamar Proctor: Yeah,just restate it for clarity purposes., I, 1 think what you're doing is you're moving to approve <br /> 542 the statement with the modification to 5.10.1.(A).(1),for protect. <br /> 543 <br /> 544 Charity Kirk: Yes. I make a motion to approve the unified development ordinance's text amendment as <br /> 545 contained in Attachment 2 with the amendment and the statement of approval and consistency, <br /> 546 indicating text amendments are reasonable on Attachment 3 with the amendment of changing <br /> 547 protection of to protect as shown in 5.10.1.(A).(1). <br /> 548 <br /> 549 Lamar Proctor: All right. Do I have a second? <br /> 550 <br /> 551 Statler Gilfillen: I will second to that. <br /> 552 <br /> 553 Lamar Proctor: All right. All in favor of adopting the statement of approval consistency with that modification may <br /> 554 say, raise your hand or say aye.All opposed? <br /> 555 <br /> 556 MOTION BY Charity Kirk to approve the statement of consistency with amendment to section 5.10.1.(A).(1). Seconded <br /> 557 by Statler Gilfillen <br /> 558 <br /> 559 MOTION PASSED 7-3: Dolores Bailey,Jonah Garson,and Beth Bronson opposed. <br /> 560 <br /> 561 Lamar Proctor: We have however many ayes,three opposed. The ayes have it, so it, the statement of approval is <br /> 562 passed with that modification. <br /> 563 <br /> 564 Cy Stober: Typically, in a split vote,we have a reason for the opposition, so we can document that for the <br /> 565 board. <br /> 566 <br /> 567 Beth Bronson: I just do not find there would be a need for it. <br /> 568 <br /> 569 Jonah Garson: I don't find there to be a need for it either and I just don't feel it's appropriate. <br /> 570 <br /> 571 Charity Kirk: What is it? <br /> 572 <br /> 573 Beth Bronson: The change. <br /> 574 <br /> 575 Jonah Garson: The grammatical change. <br /> 576 <br /> 577 Dolores Bailey: And the same for me. <br /> 578 <br /> 579 Chris Johnston: Thank you. To confirm,the problem is with the amendment, not with the process of amending, in <br /> 580 other terms is it changing the word protect or the entire process? <br /> 581 <br /> 582 Dolores Bailey: In the word protect. I don't think there's any reason to change it from protection of to protect. <br /> 583 <br /> 584 Jonah Garson: And,for me, it's the same, but also, I do think we should be having motions on amendments. <br /> 585 <br /> 586 Beth Bronson: There was no motion on the statement of consistency I didn't think. <br /> 587 <br /> 588 Jonah Garson: I think we need two. I think I would like to see going forward two separate motions. <br /> 589 <br /> 590 Lamar Proctor: Didn't you tell us before we needed to incorporate those into one motion? <br /> 591 <br /> 592 Cy Stober: You have either option. Historically,we've done the latter where they've been incorporated. <br /> 593 <br />