Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
115 <br /> 331 <br /> 332 Lamar Proctor: Okay. <br /> 333 <br /> 334 Meg Millard: The one connection is the impervious surface transfer? <br /> 335 <br /> 336 Cy Stober: Yes, but that's a civil matter between property owners, and we do administer that, and we provide <br /> 337 it as an option, but ultimately it does need to be recorded as an obligation between two property <br /> 338 owners in this case, or between properties and that, essentially it would function similar to a <br /> 339 conservation easement that that area would be dedicated for non-development because it is <br /> 340 serving as the impervious transfer. <br /> 341 <br /> 342 Whitney Watson: I also found that there were some places where the paving for the storage facility wasn't clear. <br /> 343 There are some places where it says it all needs to be asphalt, and some in your application, talk <br /> 344 about number, Size 57 washed stone. So, I'm wondering if that's just an oversight in a <br /> 345 documentation. <br /> 346 <br /> 347 Ashley Moncado: The UDO requires parking to be paved, but the applicant has issued a condition to allow for that <br /> 348 not to be the situation, and that's where the 57 stone has been proposed. As a condition,we will <br /> 349 require the access ways connecting to NC-57 to be paved. <br /> 350 <br /> 351 Whitney Watson: Right. <br /> 352 <br /> 353 Whitney Watson: Okay. And last question has to do with the sizing for the septic system. I think you proposed <br /> 354 perhaps as many as 20 people working there part time. <br /> 355 <br /> 356 Justin Chandler: No, it will be a single employee. <br /> 357 <br /> 358 Whitney Watson: Okay,you might want to look at the application, because it clearly says you expect as many as 20 <br /> 359 people there. For when they did the environmental health calculations it was based on 20. <br /> 360 <br /> 361 Justin Chandler: I think that that's in regard to a minimum. So, in the site plan in the notes, I don't have it right in <br /> 362 front of me, but in the note section on general notes, it speaks to the employee and in regard to <br /> 363 the parking situation,specifically, and it's one employee.And then what five additional parking <br /> 364 spaces, or four additional parking spaces for a total of five. I think for environmental health <br /> 365 concerns, or environmental health calculations, it's kind of similar to traffic where there's a <br /> 366 minimum required proposed. Even if the anecdotal side of it,there's,five people going in and out <br /> 367 a day, there's a minimum per building and what not. I think it's along those lines for that. So,the <br /> 368 existing septic on the facility has been approved for over 400 people.400 spectators for that <br /> 369 facility. <br /> 370 <br /> 371 Beth Bronson: The existing one? <br /> 372 <br /> 373 Justin Chandler: The existing one. <br /> 374 <br /> 375 Whitney Watson: Okay. <br /> 376 <br /> 377 Beth Bronson: It is not currently on the parcel under review, but you would potentially use. <br /> 378 <br /> 379 Justin Chandler: Correct. <br /> 380 <br /> 381 Beth Bronson: If it wasn't irreparable? <br /> 382 <br /> 383 Justin Chandler: Correct. That portion of it has been maintained around that track. <br /> 384 <br /> 385 Beth Bronson: It's technically already there. <br />