Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-02-2004-Gordon
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 06-02-2004
>
Agenda - 06-02-2004-Gordon
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 8:08:21 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:42:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/2/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
Gordon
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040602
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Revisions made to SAPFOTAC report by the <br />Orange County Planning Department in response to <br />Commissioner Gordon's May 25, 2004 Fax (see attached) <br />Orange County Plarana'rzg Director° General Con:rnent.~ The SAPFOTAC report is <br />a "snapshot" of November, 2003; therefore, all references and charts reflect <br />November, 200.3 information. At that time, Chapel HilUCarrboro's third high <br />school was slated to open in 2006-2007. New information has now been received <br />that the new high school is not expected to open unti12007-2008.. Changes will <br />likely be made to the CIP to reflect the new timefiarne if the date remains 2007- <br />2008 when the next SAPFOTAC report is written. <br />Executive Summary <br />Page i - LC.: Membership Date was changed from November 14, 200.3 to November 15, <br />200.3 as noted in the MOU. November 15, 200.3 was a Saturday, so Friday the 14°i was <br />used. <br />Page i - IhC.: Language was added to the title of the chart to clarify that the chart <br />depicts an increase or decrease in membership projection total between the prior year and <br />the current year. <br />Orange Cour¢ry PZarnting Director's Cwnnzerzts, This chart does not show an <br />increase or decrease in the growth rate between projections of 2002 and <br />projections of 2003. The growth rate projections shown on pages 35 and .36 of the <br />report show individual year annual growth rates but may not illustrate an overall <br />positive correlation with a cumulative effect on the 5 yeaz-out total. <br />This 5-year timefiame is a good plamiing period in which to respond tlu-ough <br />capital investment programming (funding sources, design, and construction). <br />Page i - IhD.: A title was added to the chart to clarify that the percentages shown are the <br />average amiual growth rates over 10 years, <br />Page ii -The word "currently" was added to 4 of the 6 Item "A"s on this page to clarify <br />the timeframe. <br />Page ii - Item B of each school level: Language was changed to indicate in which <br />direction the growth rate is moving over the next 5 years. Inmost cases, growth has <br />exhibited a positive percentage growth rate (eg: 2.5%). When a new projection year <br />shows an increase in the growth rate (ie: 2.7%), we are reporting that there has been an <br />increase in the increase (positive) growth rate. In one case, the OCMS 2002 projection <br />average four-year annualized growth rate was a -0..78% decrease or negative in value. <br />Page 1 of.3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.