Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-02-2004-Gordon
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 06-02-2004
>
Agenda - 06-02-2004-Gordon
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 8:08:21 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:42:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/2/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
Gordon
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040602
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gordon - SAPFO Report Revisions -Page 2 <br />II. 2004 Annual Report <br />A, Student Projections (pages 27-3.3) <br />My main suggestion for change was to correct the inaccurate language describing <br />the student projections for the Orange County Middle Schools. The report had originally <br />indicated that the projections showed a relatively slow but constant growth of about two <br />classrooms per year. However, as the chart for "OCS Student Projections (2003)" on <br />page .32 shows, the projections really show a decrease and some fluctuations. The actual <br />number of'students for 2003-2004 is 1671, Projections for the next year show 1627 <br />students, a decrease of 44, The projected number of students does not come back to <br />200.3-2004 levels until 2009-2010 (1679 students), In addition, the report initially had <br />given 120% as the level of service for the year prior to the opening of the new noddle <br />school #.3, whereas now the correct level of 112% has been stated. <br />B. Corrections in Numbers, Changes in Format, and Clarifications <br />In my experience, the usual practice for writing technical reports dictates that one <br />should use systematic data that is gathered and reported for all levels. That is why I <br />asked that "editorial" language be removed, If systematic data is available in the future, it <br />could be reported. I also suggested corrections to some inaccurate numbers and <br />typographical errors, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.