Agenda - 06-02-2004-Gordon - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

1. 2. 3, ~6 U. C. Siv9itle~t$ Pr®,qe~®ffis ~,L~-~. a-t' e Ctm e c /c~o'-f^-~ °~ ~ar Responsible Entity for Suggesting Change Updating of this section will be/conducted by the Planning Directors, School Representatives, Technical Advisory Committee (SAPFOTAC). Q,r~ d Y~e ~ c,%~~ ~" ri-t ~ ~e v~%S' I3efinitwn -The result of the average of the five models represented by l0~yeaz (dcs Fh~ numerical membership projections by school level for each school district. c ti-~cs 1 Standard for: Chapel Hill Cazrboro School District See Attachment II C.4 4. Analysis ofExxisting Conditions Standard for: Orange County School District See Attachment II C.3 The membership figures and percentage growth on the attachments show continued growth in both systems. Variability by school level and between the School Districts is also noted. The projections models were updated using current (November 15) memberships and ten yeazs were projected thereafter. Recomr~aendation - Use statistics as noted in 3 above Recomneendation- Use statistics as noted in 3 above vc s ~ ~- 3 C l+c`~ ~ ~- `f Elementary Projections are consistent with previous years that show a relatively moderate but constant growth of about seven classrooms a year. The 105% level of service will be maintained until a projected 10°i Elementary school is expected to open in 2006-2007. In the later years of the ten yeaz Capital Investment Plan, the need for an additional Elementary #11 would be projected. Also, note khat a mild decrease in Elementary Projections are consistent with previous years that show a relatively slow but constant growth of about three classrooms a year. During the ten. year timefianae, membership is projected to be within the level of service (I.OS) standards of the School APFO. ~'h ~- >~lemen hoollevel: anomaly, because e• growth in th 'strict has ,wnar an housing ~`~-'" a ~-~- av (e,~,~s g'l try ~ 6 / ~.~. ^1" (i~w4 z~