Orange County NC Website
Orange County Board of Commissioners -June 2, 2004 Meeting Agenda <br />Addition to Item Sf Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (SAPFO) -Approval <br />of Annual Certifcations <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: BOCC and Manager <br />From: Alice Gordon <br />Subject: Overview of Commissioner Gordon's Suggested Revisions to the Schools <br />Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (SAPFO) Annual Report <br />Date:.Tune 1, 2004 <br />Copy to Craig Benedict <br />On May 25, 2004 I sent a rather informal fax to Craig Benedict giving my <br />comments and suggested revisions to the SAPFO report, FIis reply was given in the <br />document, "Revisions made in the SAPFOTAC report by the Orange County Planning <br />Depaztment in response to Commissioner Cordon's May 25, 2004 Fax." Since my <br />handwritten comments may not be entirely clear, I am indicating below the basic issues <br />that were addressed in my fax. There aze also some suggestions for the future. <br />I. 2004 SAPFOTAC Executive Summary <br />A, Five Year Comparison of Student Membership Projections <br />The "5 year out Snapshot Comparison," which is Item IhC on page i, needed to be <br />clearly labeled as an increase or decrease m projections between the prior year and the <br />current year, However, in the future, I think it would be more important to provide a <br />summary chart showing how many student seats are available (unused) and how many <br />are needed. What we need to highlight in the Executive Summary is the most basic data <br />concerning whether there will be a need to create more capacity during the next few <br />years. Accordingly, I have made a chart for the five-year planning period, and included it <br />as page 3 of this memo. I thought it was helpful to show the data in both chart and baz <br />graph form, My suggestion for the SAPFO report is that we should produce the same baz <br />graphs for the current student projections that the budget office has produced in the past. <br />B, Increase or Decrease in the Growth Rate <br />Item B on page ii deals with the direction of the growth rate for each level <br />(Elementary, Middle, and High School) and both school districts, The information was <br />originally presented in a confusing way, but now the report indicates that in five of the <br />six cases, the growth rate was positive (increasing), and describes the increase or <br />decrease in the rate. In one case, Orange County Middle Schools (OCMS), the four-yeaz <br />growth rate was negative (decreasing), though the decrease has become more gradual. <br />