Browse
Search
Agenda 06-03-2025; 5-c - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendments – Telecommunication Facilities Standards
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
Agenda - 06-03-2025 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 06-03-2025; 5-c - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendments – Telecommunication Facilities Standards
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:34:14 PM
Creation date
5/29/2025 12:55:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2025
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-c
Document Relationships
Agenda for June 3, 2025 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2025\Agenda - 06-03-2025 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
65 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 594 Lamar Proctor: Right,that's been the practice.Jonah is recommending that we split that for clarity purposes. <br /> 595 <br /> 596 Statler Gilfillen: I mean if we can in the future, I would agree with that. <br /> 597 <br /> 598 Venkat Yendapalli: I think maybe, Jonah,you're looking at like do we even need it. Do the rest of the board support <br /> 599 that amendment. Right? <br /> 600 <br /> 601 Lamar Proctor: Yes. All right. So,this will have to be slightly modified? <br /> 602 <br /> 603 Cy Stober: Yes, and until it is adopted at the hearing to up to that second. All of this, even though it is <br /> 604 informed by federal and state regulations, can be modified without the whole process. We're <br /> 605 already ready in the process, so if there are other comments you wish to make,you're welcome to <br /> 606 make them in the interim to the board or to me. <br /> 607 <br /> 608 Lamar Proctor: Sorry for any confusion. I'm trying to incorporate the planning board's input. I know that you all <br /> 609 worked a long, hard time on this stuff, and I know it's very specialized. And that's a nit-picky thing, <br /> 610 but future generations when they read that ordinance won't get offended by that grammatical <br /> 611 indiscretion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.